Defining C++14

Hi,

A new C++ meeting is coming up in a few days. Many, many proposals are on the table; they can be found here and here. Out of those proposals only very few will be discussed at the meeting; likely only those that are about to make it into C++14.

Given that I am rather new in this business I have a hard time predicting what those will be. But I can guess :-) Here are my guesses of what will very likely be relevant, worth reading, and especially worth commenting on:

Did you notice something? Almost all of them are in the evolution part of C++ - I have a hard time predicting what for instance the Concurrency Study Group will do for C++14. I think this will be one of the main tasks in Bristol: clarify what the Study Groups expect to get into C++14.

The above short list is not meant to be exhaustive; there will be many, many more discussions at Bristol. If there is something that you think should definitely be discussed, and for which you have an opinion, then please let me know.

We will have a CERN Computing Seminar dedicated to Bristol on April 4 (in two days!) at 11am, where I will explain how the C++ standard meetings work, present some papers that might be interesting, and collect input for my positions at Bristol. Let's discuss what our expectation of C++14 is - see you there!

Cheers,
Axel

For example look at this D

For example look at this D code using Mixins http://www.deadalnix.me/2013/05/10/type-safe-tagged-union-in-d-programmi... Now imagine to do the same using C++ Preprocessor. IMHO C++ Preprocessor should be deprecated (optional) in C++17. We all know that using Preprocessor is bad but unfortunately we all need to use it.

Her is more about C++14

Her is more about C++14 http://www.meetingcpp.com/index.php/blog.html But what is about Reflection, is it in C++17 ? How about mixin like in D ? http://dlang.org/mixin.html Apparently there are some voices again "Static If".

Re: More about C++14

Hi DevO,

Thanks for your comment. Your link refers to an unofficial list of papers; the authoritative one is here.

We are not yet planning C++17; Bristol was specifically about C++14. Digit separators are out; many, many other good things are in. I will post the results in about three weeks, when the post-Bristol mailing is out.

We had a first meeting of the Reflection Study Group; lots of interest, good plans - but that's for C++17 at the earliest. It still requires a lot of work and discussions. Mixins were not discussed as there was no proposal for them. Class generation through reflection was discussed as part of reflection, though. Static if was discussed, too. As I said, the summary will come up soon!

Cheers, Axel