Re: [Fwd: [ROOT] *TOGGLE*]

• Next message: Andrei Kouznetsov: "Re: [ROOT] Indefinite integral"
• Previous message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] Indefinite integral"
• In reply to: Thomas Bretz: "[Fwd: [ROOT] *TOGGLE*]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Thomas,

 it is not really needed for methods marked //toggle but this current
implementation checks for a matching data member. To be fixed.

Cheers, Fons.




On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 15:55, Thomas Bretz wrote:
> Seems nobody got this eMail...
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [ROOT] *TOGGLE*
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 17:05:26 +0100
> From: Thomas Bretz <tbretz@astro.uni-wuerzburg.de>
> To: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> why does this functionality need a existing data-member, eg
> Bool_t fMyBit;
> 
> Isn't it enough if the corresponding Set, Get/Is functions are
> available, eg:
> void SetMyBit(Bool_t b) { b ? SetBit(1<<14) : ResetBit(1<<14); } //*TOGGLE*
> Bool_t IsMyBit() const { return TestBit(1<<14); }
> 
> Best regards,
> Thomas.
-- 
Org:    CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
Mail:   1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch              Phone: +41 22 7679248
WWW:    http://www.rademakers.org/fons/      Fax:   +41 22 7679480

• Next message: Andrei Kouznetsov: "Re: [ROOT] Indefinite integral"
• Previous message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] Indefinite integral"
• In reply to: Thomas Bretz: "[Fwd: [ROOT] *TOGGLE*]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:06 MET