Hi Thomas, I've added support for *TOGGLE* without the need for a matching data member. To do what you want see this piece of cvs log: add support for *TOGGLE* context menu methods that are not related to a data member with the same name (e.g. a method that changes a bit in a data member with a different name). For these methods one can add the comment option: *GETTER=<getter-method> to say what the getter method to use, like: void SetNoExponent(Bool_t noex=kTRUE); //*TOGGLE* *GETTER=GetNoExponent So in your case: void SetMyBit(Bool_t b) { ...; } //*TOGGLE* *GETTER=IsMyBit should do the trick. Cheers, Fons. > Hi all, > > why does this functionality need a existing data-member, eg > Bool_t fMyBit; > > Isn't it enough if the corresponding Set, Get/Is functions are > available, eg: > void SetMyBit(Bool_t b) { b ? SetBit(1<<14) : ResetBit(1<<14); } > //*TOGGLE* > Bool_t IsMyBit() const { return TestBit(1<<14); } > > Best regards, > Thomas. -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://www.rademakers.org/fons/ Fax: +41 22 7679480
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:06 MET