ROOT latex is different on many points. I think that is a minor problem.
-- Org: CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23 - Switzerland Mailbox: J25910 E-Mail: Olivier.Couet_at_cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7676522 WWW: http://cern.ch/Olivier.Couet/ Fax: +41 22 7670300 -----Original Message----- From: Nesterov Stanislav [mailto:qleap_at_pnpi.spb.ru] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:36 AM To: Olivier Couet Cc: roottalk_at_pcroot.cern.ch Subject: Re: [ROOT] Subscript placing Oh... Now I see you are right! Thank you! But can this "confusion" be fixed? In original (Knuth) TeX one doesn't have to bother about placing _ or ^ with empty sub(super)script to get correct placing. Are the ROOT TLatex algorithm and TeX algorithm very different? -- Best regards, Stanislav. On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Olivier Couet wrote:Received on Fri Oct 07 2005 - 10:44:12 MEST
>
> The sum symbol is waiting a lower and upper limit, you haven't give
any,
> that's why it gets confused. Try:
>
> #sum_{}^{} (#vec{p}_{t})
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Nesterov Stanislav wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there any way to put subscript letter 't' in TLatex formula like
"#sum
> > (#vec{p}_{t})" in a right place?
> > Now I can see 't' too much below the baseline of 'p' letter. But if
I am
> > drawing "#vec{p}_{t}" then it is in place as it should be (more or
less).
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 14:45:12 MET