Christian,
> Why not?!
it's reserved (from the C standard) for the compiler implementers, including the standard libraries, like here:
> In fact, GCC's libstdc++ uses underscores as the first character of data
> members. See for example "stdexcept":
>
> class logic_error : public exception
> {
> string _M_msg;
As such, any names starting with _ may alias compiler/standard header names.
In practice, starting member variables with an underscore is usually harmless, b/c the class gives a scope. A class/struct name is not protected in the same way, however.
> BTW, using an underscore as the first character of a structure name is a
> _very_ common idiom in C.
Yes, which is why the the C++ standard added that double _ (__) is now also reserved for the compiler writers.
Best regards,
Wim
-- Wim.Lavrijsen_at_cern.ch -- WLavrijsen_at_lbl.gov -- www.lavrijsen.net "Stop making excuses for your software." --first step towards quality "GIGO is not a valid design pattern." --corollaryReceived on Fri Aug 17 2007 - 18:38:22 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 17 2007 - 23:50:02 CEST