Hi, ROOTers!
I have one question about the role of default constructor for ROOT
objects.
In the class TMyClass I plan to use only one constructor:
class TMyClass : public TObject
{
public:
TMyClass(Int_t a);
void Work(void);
private:
Int_t fA;
ClassDef(TMyClass,1)
};
TMyClass::TMyClass(Int_t a)
{
// fA initialising ....
....
}
The function TMyClass::Work(void) will crash if fA is out of some legal
range. It seems that everything is fine: TMyClass::TMyClass(Int_t) sets
fA and TMyClass::Work(void) will work without problem. But in ROOT we must
have default constructor too. Will it be save to have empty default
constructor TMyClass::TMyClass(void){} ?
P.S. I know that it is possible to have the prototype TMyClass(Int_t a=0)
but it may help only for simple cases.
Thanks in advance,
Alexander Zvyagin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:34:36 MET