Hi, while compiling 2.22 I get the following warnings that look seriously : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... g++ -g -O2 -Wall -fPIC -DR__GLIBC -c BASE_Application.cxx BASE_Application.cxx: In method `void TApplication::GetOptions(int *, char **)': BASE_Application.cxx:283: warning: `class TObject * w' might be used uninitialized in this function BASE_Application.cxx:284: warning: `class TObjLink * lnk' might be used uninitialized in this function BASE_Application.cxx:286: warning: `const class TObjLink * this' might be used uninitialized in this function BASE_Application.cxx:287: warning: `class TObjLink * this' might be used uninitialized in this function ... Generating dictionary G3D_G__G3D.cxx... ( ... ) Note: Link requested for undefined class TPoints3DABC FILE: LINE:0 ... Generating dictionary H_G__Hist.cxx... ( ... ) *** Datamember TSpectrum::fPosition: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TSpectrum::fPositionX: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TSpectrum::fPositionY: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) ... Generating dictionary META_G__Meta.cxx... Limitation: macro handled as typedef char TWin32SendClass; FILE:TCint.h LINE:33 ... Generating dictionary TREE_G__Tree.cxx... ( ... ) *** Datamember TLeafB::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TLeafI::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TLeafF::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TLeafS::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TLeafD::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) *** Datamember TLeafC::fValue: pointer to fundamental type (need manual intervention) ... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Could you please look at them. I've also got a small question related to the Tree::MakeClass ( my hobby, lately ). What makes you think that the max. number of branches is 100 ? I'd rather say it's nleaves, right ? Or did I miss some king of a limitation in ROOT ? Thanks in advance, Jacek.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:34 MET