Re: Changing branch name ...

From: Rene Brun (Rene.Brun@cern.ch)
Date: Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:11:37 MET


Dear Pasha,
You can already change the name of the file associated to a branch.
Anton was requesting something different: the possibility to change
the name of a branch.

Rene Brun


On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Pasha Murat (630)840-8237 FNAL (630)859-3463 home wrote:

> Rene Brun wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Anton,
> > Currently, you cannot and should not change the name of a branch in a
> > tree.
> > SetName should be redefined in TBranch and derivatives.
> > 
> 
> I think that the possibility to change a name of a file associated with a
> given branch would be very useful in the context of a full-scale
> data handling system. Let's assume a ROOT tree which branches can reside on
> different media, such that some of them would be disk-resident and the others
> would be staged to tape. Then the header of such tree (always disk-resident!) 
> would have special names for these branches, for example:
> 
> 			/stage:migrated_branch_1.root
> 
> making it possible to read in the tree header, loop over all the 
> branches and to send a request to the data handling system to 
> spool the files for tape-resident ones back to disk (if their processing 
> was requested). 
> The last step of this procedure would be to redefine the
> file names for these branches IN MEMORY (NOT IN DISK-RESIDENT tree header)
> to point to the spool area after which the analysis / production job could
> start.
> 						best, pasha
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:50:21 MET