Hello George, I've implemented protected member accessing mechanism. Following pragma statement makes it able. #pragma link C++ class+protected [classname]; Only non-constructor,non-destructor members can be accessed as protected. This feature will be included in cint5.14.41. Thank you Masaharu Goto > >Hello Root/CINTers, > >Masaharu wrote: > >(about protected data members, and presumably this will apply to >virtual functions as well, in interpreted classes deriving from >compiled classes): > >> > This could be theoretically solved by generating stub sub-class for >> > every precompiled class. However, this will double the size of dictionary . >> > This is quite fundamental for a compiler independent C++ interprter. > >I agree that this is not desireable. It might however be desireable to >generate such stub sub-classes for a select set of classes (those that >the developers realize may be frequently derived from by interpreter >users), with which sub-classes so generated being controlled by a >#pragma. This would be quite nice; I know of at least two and possibly >more places we would make use of this functionality in our analysis >package Phat, if it were available; at the moment we're currently >effectively creating stub classes 'by hand' for the classes we thought >it was essential that this be available, and dealing with it in other >places we would probably prefer not to. > >What do you think, Masa? > >George Heintzelam >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:50:27 MET