Hi Thomas, If the TArrayX were derived from TObject, the problem would not exist. The decision to not derive from TObject had several motivations. Objects such as TArray can be many in a class, including very short arrays. The overhead of TObject was considered not acceptable in this case and we did not have the split mode implemented at this time. I repeat again that TArrays will be accepted in split mode with the upgraded Root I/O system that we are working on. Rene Brun Thomas Bretz wrote: > > Hello Rene, > > let me ask another question. Why is the TArray not derived from TObject? > Then I would have what I need, wouldn't I? What is the intention of the > TArrays? > > Thanks, > Thomas.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 11:50:37 MET