Re: [ROOT] const-ness and vector classes

From: Rene Brun (Rene.Brun@cern.ch)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2001 - 12:26:24 MET

Next message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] Problem with TFolder in a split TTree"
Previous message: Rolf Dubitzky: "Re: [ROOT] batch without script"
In reply to: Dave Casper: "[ROOT] const-ness and vector classes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Dave,

You are right. I have made the corresponding changes in TLorentzVector,
but also in TVector3.

Thanks for the remark.

Rene Brun

Dave Casper wrote:
> 
>         Hi,
> 
> The vector classes (TLorentzVector and TVector3, aka "the bane of my
> existence") have some member functions which lack what one would expect to
> be the proper const-ness:
> 
> Using TLorentzVector as an example:
> 
> TLorentzVector(Double_t* carray)
> TLorentzVector(Float_t* carray)
> 
> [the argument of the constructor should be "const Double_t*", etc.]
> 
> GetXYZT(Double_t* carray)
> GetXYZT(Float_t* carray)
> 
> [member function should be declared const]
> 
> Dave
> dcasper@uci.edu

Next message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] Problem with TFolder in a split TTree"
Previous message: Rolf Dubitzky: "Re: [ROOT] batch without script"
In reply to: Dave Casper: "[ROOT] const-ness and vector classes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:33 MET