Re: [ROOT] Making test example on win98

From: Nick van Eijndhoven (Nick@phys.uu.nl)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 12:55:11 MET


Hi Anton,
I am pleased to hear that you are creating ROOT binaries from scratch
on a Win98 platform.
As you know after ROOT 2.22/10 I have several problems when running the
ROOT binaries from the web on my win98 machine (you can ask Valery Fine
for details if you want). So win98 users are basically bound to stay with
the old 2.22/10 version.
I would like to suggest that once you have succeeded to create a completely
working set of ROOT binaries on a win98 system, that this version will also
be made available to the outside world via the ROOT web pages.
On the pages one could then indicate this version as win98 specific.
Could the ROOT team please consider this, since in our group many people
use laptops and for these things we have the feeling that the flexible win98
OS is much more convenient than winNT or win2000. 
  
                                                         Cheers,
                                                          Nick. 

-- 
Dr. Nick van Eijndhoven mailto:nick@phys.uu.nl http://www.phys.uu.nl/~nick
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Org.:    Utrecht University/Nikhef, Department of Subatomic Physics
Address: P.O. Box 80.000, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Phone:   +31-30-2532331(direct) +31-30-2531492(secr.)  Fax: +31-30-2518689
NIKHEF:  +31-20-5922028(direct) +31-20-5922000(secr.)  Fax: +31-20-5925155
CERN:    +41-22-7679751(direct) +41-22-7675857(secr.)  Fax: +41-22-7679480
Offices: Buys Ballot lab. 710 (Utrecht)   H350 (Nikhef)   B23 1-020 (CERN)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Anton Fokin wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> well, I was using Makefile included in the test directory. Yes, I saw
> Makefile.win32 in the same directory and I have tryied this one too (and it
> works somehow). Anyway, I suppose that if there is a Makefile in the binary
> distribution, it should be naturally related to this specific version of the
> distribution, so that a user can type nmake and get things compiled.
> Moreover, there is "win32" portion of lines in the Makefile, so that I
> assume this file is the correct one.
> 
> Anyway, what I need is a makefile which works on both linux and win32,
> depending on a platform. Do we have such clever one? I am not win32/VC
> expert, so that I would like to get my linux root programs easily recompiled
> under win32. I thought I can use generic ROOT test Makefile upper part for
> that... Can I?
> 
> Regards,
> Anton



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:34 MET