Nice. Was there a reason to put consts? Does it improve anything except making c++ funs happy? It is OK if you introduce non-compatible changes which can be easily seen when you recompile your code but in the case of const a compiler does not issue any warning on const and non-const "overloaded" functions. It is Ok if a user plays with one class and can easily see that someting is going wrong at run time. Unfortunately some people develop more complex things. /Anton http://www.smartquant.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Rene Brun <Rene.Brun@cern.ch> To: Anton Fokin <anton.fokin@smartquant.com> Cc: roottalk <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [ROOT] Print() collections > Anton, > > That's why we put the changes about Constness as the first item in our > release notes for version 3.00/06 that you can find at: > > http://root.cern.ch/root/roottalk/roottalk01/0956.html > > Rene Brun > > Anton Fokin wrote: > > > > Ok, > > > > now I see you've introduced > > > > TObject::Print(..) const > > > > so actually I do not overload Print with my old non-const prints... which I > > have in all my (about hundred of) classes... I also foress that some of > > other overloads are not overloads any longer. > > > > What a mess... > > > > /Anton > > > > http://www.smartquant.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Rene Brun <Rene.Brun@cern.ch> > > To: Anton Fokin <anton.fokin@smartquant.com> > > Cc: roottalk <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch> > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:34 PM > > Subject: Re: [ROOT] Print() collections > > > > > Hi Anton, > > > > > > You must be using an old version. TCollection::Print uses an iterator > > > and not the macro ForEach. > > > > > > I take this opportunity to mention again: > > > PLEASE ALWAYS INDICATE WHICH VERSION/OS YOU USE > > > > > > Rene Brun > > > > > > Anton Fokin wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Rene&Fons, > > > > > > > > by default TCollection uses > > > > > > > > this->ForEach(TObject,Print)(option); > > > > > > > > Thus if you put objects derived from TObject with their own Print() > > memeber > > > > function you will still get > > > > > > > > OBJ: TTicker TTicker A ticker > > > > OBJ: TTicker TTicker A ticker > > > > OBJ: TTicker TTicker A ticker > > > > OBJ: TTicker TTicker A ticker > > > > OBJ: TTicker TTicker A ticker > > > > > > > > instead of actual Prints. > > > > > > > > Ticker3 Bloomberg3 Reuter3 NYSE3 CUSIP3 > > > > Ticker2 Bloomberg2 Reuter2 NYSE2 CUSIP2 > > > > Ticker5 Bloomberg5 Reuter5 NYSE5 CUSIP5 > > > > Ticker4 Bloomberg4 Reuter4 NYSE4 CUSIP4 > > > > Ticker1 Bloomberg1 Reuter1 NYSE1 CUSIP1 > > > > > > > > Is it done on purpose? If not, I propose you use another iterator like > > > > next() to get things printed correctly. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > http://www.smartquant.com > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:39 MET