Thorsten Glebe wrote: ... snip ... > > All these problems do not exist of course with trivial Vector/Matrix > implementations like those of the CLHEP library. Those > you can easily incorporate in CINT, but as I mentioned, the performance is > (even in compiled code) low. > ... snip... I guess it is a matter of my complete ignorance in these issues, but could somebody on the thread elaborate a bit on why C++ implementations of matrix operations are supposed to suffer from low performance? What causes the C++ code doing the matrix inversion to be slow compared to its FORTRAN equivalent? -thanks, Pasha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:45 MET