RE:Re: RE:Re: [ROOT] CINT thread safety hac

From: Masaharu Goto (MXJ02154@nifty.ne.jp)
Date: Sat May 26 2001 - 03:30:24 MEST


Hello Christoph,

An improvement to the CINT thread safety hack is implemented in
cint5.14.89. This version will be copied to CERN this weekend.

Please see RELNOTE.txt and demo/multilibcint/README.txt. There
still remains some problems, but I hope this improvement can 
give you some benefit.

Thank you
Masaharu Goto


>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 20:34:34 +0300
>From: Christoph Bugel <chris@uxsrvc.tti-telecom.com>
>To: Masaharu Goto <MXJ02154@nifty.ne.jp>
>Subject: Re: RE:Re: [ROOT] CINT thread safety hack?
>
>
>Hello Masaharu,
>
>Actually the idea was of a collegue of mine, here in TTI.  On the one hand, w
e
>know it a 'not very elegant' (to say the least) workaround, but on the other
>hand - I can't think of a reason why it shouldn't work.  We need to use this 
on
>most platforms, and I already tried this on Linux/gcc-3.0-snapshot,
>Solaris/CC5, and NT4/msvc. On Solaris it already seems to work quite well.
>
>
>I read somewhere in the CINT documentation that you recommend people to
>'register' when they are using cint.
>So I would like to register myself and my employer as a cint user :)
>
>I am using cint as part of a larger C++ framework that our company uses as a
>basis to develop our applications. TTI-Telecom is a software company, with +-
>500 employees. We are selling solutions (servers + software) to telephony
>companies all over the world. We need 'scripting capabilities' in our
>framework, and we intend to use cint for this. I am a programmer working at
>TTI, and my job is currently to implement the scripting capabilities of our
>framework.
>
>Thanks a lot :-)
>Yours,
>
>Christoph Bugel
>TTI Telecom
>www.tti-telecom.com
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:46 MET