Hi Rene,
now it works! Great! Thanks a lot.
Eberhard
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rene Brun" <Rene.Brun@cern.ch>
To: "Eberhard Widmann" <e.widmann@cern.ch>
Cc: <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ROOT] root pro version on Alpha OSF1 with cxx 6.2
> Hi Eberhard,
>
> Could you try once more. I have rebuilt libGX11.so linking explictly with
> libXpm.a. I have rebuilt also the tar file and the version on AFS.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Rene Brun
>
> Eberhard Widmann wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rene,
> >
> > with the new tar file it still does not work. Apparently there are other
> > links to libXpm.so. Here is what happens:
> >
> > ==========================================================
> > dxad301: /home/pbarheli#> root
> > dlopen error: object libXpm.so from liblist in /usr/root/lib/libGX11.so
has
> > ver
> > sion "4.10", which does not match the found object: /usr/shlib/libXpm.so
> > (with
> > version "4.8")
> > Load Error: Failed to load Dynamic link library /usr/root/lib/libGX11.so
> > Error: No symbol TGX11 in current scope FILE: LINE:0
> > Error: type TGX11 not defined FILE: LINE:0
> > *** Interpreter error recovered ***
> > Error in <TGClient::GetFontByName>: couldn't retrieve
> > font -adobe-helvetica-med
> > ium-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 nor backup font "fixed"
> > Error in <TGClient::GetFontByName>: couldn't retrieve
> > font -adobe-helvetica-bol
> > d-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 nor backup font "fixed"
> > Error in <TGClient::GetFontByName>: couldn't retrieve
> > font -adobe-helvetica-med
> > ium-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 nor backup font "fixed"
> > Error in <TGClient::GetFontByName>: couldn't retrieve
> > font -adobe-courier-mediu
> > m-r-*-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1 nor backup font "fixed"
> > *******************************************
> > * *
> > * W E L C O M E to R O O T *
> > * *
> > * Version 3.01/06 13 July 2001 *
> > * *
> > * You are welcome to visit our Web site *
> > * http://root.cern.ch *
> > * *
> > *******************************************
> >
> > CINT/ROOT C/C++ Interpreter version 5.15.06, June 30 2001
> > Type ? for help. Commands must be C++ statements.
> > Enclose multiple statements between { }.
> > Warning: Interpreted class iofstream derived from precompiled class
iostream
> > FI
> > LE:/usr/root/cint/include/iostream.h LINE:426
> > !!!There are some limitations regarding compiled/interpreted class
> > inheritance
> >
> > *** Break *** segmentation violation
> >
> > ==========================================================
> > But I saw that there are patches for 4.0D that I have not yet installed,
> > maybe that will solve the problem.
> >
> > regards Eberhard
> >
> > > Hi Eberhard,
> > >
> > > I am building the Alpha versions of ROOT on the AMS machines at CERN.
> > > This machine is running 4.0.D with cxx version 6.2
> > > Apparently the "official" versions at CERN are 4.0.F with cxx version
6.1
> > !
> > > However, we know that cxx6.1 is a buggy compiler.
> > >
> > > I have rebuild the bin/root executable front-end by linking explictly
> > > with a libXpm.a library instead of the system libXpm.so.
> > > The new tar file is now available on the Web. I have also installed it
> > under
> > > AFS.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if this fixes your problem.
> > >
> > > Rene Brun
> > >
> > > Eberhard Widmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Fons,
> > > >
> > > > could you anyway tell me which version of Digital Unix (E, F, or G)
it
> > was
> > > > compiled with? I do not want to upgrade to some version that
afterwards
> > > > shows other incompatibilities.
> > > >
> > > > regards Eberhard
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Eberhard,
> > > > >
> > > > > you can use any new version of libXpm (4.10 or 4.11).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers, Fons.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 07:19:25PM +0200, Eberhard Widmann wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I downloaded the pro version of root precompiled for Digital
Unix
> > (OSF1)
> > > > 4.0
> > > > > > with cxx 6.2. It does not run on OSF1 4.0D
> > > > > > because the version of libXpm.so is too old (4.8 instead of
4.10).
> > That
> > > > > > looks like I need to upgrade, but to which version? 4.0E, F or
G?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I could not find this information anywhere on the web or in the
> > readme
> > > > files
> > > > > > as I would have expected it. Maybe you could provide this
> > information in
> > > > > > future. The general CERN webpages still say 4.0D is the
certified
> > > > version of
> > > > > > OSF1, but that might be outdated(?).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eberhard Widmann
> > > > >
> ----------- --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > Dr. Eberhard Widmann
> > > > > > ASACUSA collaboration, U Tokyo / CERN
> > > > > > CERN, EP Division
> > > > > > CH 1211 Geneve 23
> > > > > > Tel. +41-22-767-8306, mobile +41-79-201-4077
> > > > > > Fax. +41-22-767-3500
> > > > > > mailto:e.widmann@cern.ch
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
> > > > > Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
> > > > > E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248
> > > > > WWW: http://root.cern.ch/~rdm/ Fax: +41 22 7677910
> > > > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 01 2002 - 17:50:52 MET