I'll try to check for the VC++ compiler level and make the rule only when that compiler is used (we do that already for some other compilers). Cheers, Fons. On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 17:05, Nick van Eijndhoven wrote: > Hi Rene, > Degrading the TStreamerInfo opt level for windows in general > just because of bugs in the .net compiler is not a good idea > to my opinion. > I would suggest that .net users just build their own > root binaries and use lower opt level as long as the bugs are > there. Once the .net compiler is in good shape, one could think > of providing also the binaries for the .net compiler using the > standard opt level. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > Rene Brun wrote: > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > Thanks for sending your changes to the Makefile. I am surprised > > to see so many bugs in the MS .NET compiler. > > > > I imported most of your minor changes to the Makefile for the cleanup process. > > I also took your changes to the Makefile.win32 and incorporated the same > > mods in Makefile.win32gdk. > > > > I did not take your patch for TTreeFormulaManager.h. I do not want > > to mess a class because of a MS compiler bug. I changed the destructor > > to be public instead for all cases. (a pity) > > > > I did not take your mods to degrade the optimisation level when compiling > > TStreamerInfo. Compiling this class with optimisation is very important. > > We may introduce a case for Windows in general to compile this class > > with no optmisation. To be discussed. > > > > Now in CVS. > > > > We do not intend to provide binaries in the short term (next few weeks) > > for .NET. I encourage Axel in his suggestion to see if binaries compiled > > under VC++6 work also in the .NET environment. > > > > Rene Brun > > > > Axel Naumann wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Do we need a dedicated .net binary? Or is it sufficient to have the code > > > patched such that it builds under .net and only have a vc6 binary > > > version? I believe we should first test whether the root vc6 binaries > > > work with .net (e.g. aclic needs to be tested); I don't know of any a > > > priori reason why that shouldn't work. Can someone do that? (I'd > > > volunteer to do this over the weekend, incorporating Matt's diff into > > > current cvs sources, but maybe someone else is faster.) > > > > > > Cheers, Axel. > > > > > > GENTIT Francois-Xavier DAPNIA wrote: > > > > Dear members of the ROOT team, > > > > I am waiting upon ROOT being distributed for Visual C++.net to install it > > > > on my PC. I see that it works, seing the message on ROOTTALK by Matthew D. > > > > Langston. Do you intend to make a download version of ROOT for Visual > > > > C++.net? > > > > > > > > François-Xavier Gentit > > > > DAPNIA/SPP CEA Saclay > > > > http://gentit.home.cern.ch/gentit/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics. Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248 WWW: http://root.cern.ch/~rdm/ Fax: +41 22 7679480
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET