>does it make sense to use the same libNEATRawData_LinkDef.h file
>for generating each ***Dict.C?
>Maybe the pb comes with this!
No it does not. By doing so, you generate several time the same dictionary
(hence the duplicate symbols). However, it is perfectly okay to have one
dictionary for many classes. So the case where you omit the 2nd dictionary
is good way to go.
Cheers,
Philippe.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
[mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]On Behalf Of François Mauger
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Rene Brun
Cc: ROOT talk
Subject: Re: [ROOT] [root 3.03/09 and alphacxx6] multiply defined while
building .so
Ok rene,
There is two points:
first: if I do what you suggested, no change.
second: if I don't include TNEAT***_Dict.o in the share libs (as in your
G3D sample), the building of libXXX.so is ok!
note also the way I built ***Dict.C:
Generating dictionary TNEATNemo3Detector_Dict.C...
rootcint -f ./dict/TNEATNemo3Detector_Dict.C -c \
-I./include -I./dict \
TNEATNemo3Detector.h \
libNEATRawData_LinkDef.h <--------------------
|
Generating dictionary TNEATObject_Dict.C... |
rootcint -f ./dict/TNEATObject_Dict.C -c \ | the same file
-I./include -I./dict \ | with the whole
TNEATObject.h \ | list of #pragma
libNEATRawData_LinkDef.h <--------------------
...
does it make sense to use the same libNEATRawData_LinkDef.h file
for generating each ***Dict.C?
Maybe the pb comes with this!
frc
--
François Mauger
Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire de Caen et Université de Caen
ENSICAEN/ISMRA - 6, Boulevard du Marechal Juin, 14050 CAEN Cedex, FRANCE
e-mail: mauger@caelav.in2p3.fr
tel.: (0/+33) 2 31 45 25 12
fax: (0/+33) 2 31 45 25 49
internet: http://www.physique.unicaen.fr/~fmauger/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:09 MET