Re: [ROOT] calling bytecode function problem

From: Masaharu Goto (MXJ02154@nifty.ne.jp)
Date: Wed Mar 19 2003 - 00:52:21 MET

Next message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] 2D Fit autoscaling problem"
Previous message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] arrays and STL classes in trees"
In reply to: Jacek M. Holeczek: "[ROOT] calling bytecode function problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello Jacek,

Very simple G__CallFunc example shows the way and I had no
problem with that.  Will send me small example code so that we
can reproduce the effect.

Thank you
Masa Goto


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jacek M. Holeczek" <holeczek@us.edu.pl>
To: "RootTalk" <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:34 PM
Subject: [ROOT] calling bytecode function problem


> The ROOT is 3.05/02/03 in a RH7.3/i386 with gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-3.3.2.
> I observe that a compiled code is able to call interpreted code as
> long as the function is G__INTERPRETEDFUNC. As soon as it changes into
> G__BYTECODEFUNC (the function is bytecompiled) there is a segmentation
> violation coming from "func.Exec((void*)NULL)".
> Best regards,
> Jacek.
>

Next message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] 2D Fit autoscaling problem"
Previous message: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] arrays and STL classes in trees"
In reply to: Jacek M. Holeczek: "[ROOT] calling bytecode function problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:10 MET