Re: [ROOT] STL, split trees and TTree::Draw() -- part 1

From: Walter F.J. Mueller (W.F.J.Mueller@gsi.de)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 13:29:03 MEST

Next message: dwkim: "[ROOT] About the merge for root file which include the trees."
Previous message: Masaharu Goto: "Re: [CINT] FW: [ROOT] CINT and STL vector of private class"
In reply to: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] STL, split trees and TTree::Draw() -- part 1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rene Brun wrote:
> As indicated in the mail you are quoting:
>   "Note that when a class contains STL objects, you cannot use the split
>     mode for the branch supporting this class."
> In addition, TTree::Draw has never been able to digest an STL vector.

Well, I assumed that this statement was outdated and got mislead by
the documentation of TTree::Bronch() making the broad statement

   "It supports the full C++, including STL and has the same behaviour
    in split or non-split mode. classname does not have to derive from
    TObject."

So I'm truely looking forward to 3.06.

			Cheers,	Walter

Next message: dwkim: "[ROOT] About the merge for root file which include the trees."
Previous message: Masaharu Goto: "Re: [CINT] FW: [ROOT] CINT and STL vector of private class"
In reply to: Rene Brun: "Re: [ROOT] STL, split trees and TTree::Draw() -- part 1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:11 MET