Hi Fons, > my personal opinion is that Apple makes a mistake to keep on > supporting (as only Unix like platform) the .so and .dylib model (i.e. > making a distinction between as shared library and a pluging). It makes > porting a lot of software a pain (as we noticed with the ROOT port). I tend to agree with you. It probably had something to do with the loading mechanism (Mach-O ?) but also, as you say, with some people's stubbornness. Unfortunately, I think it's too late. Too much software already designed that way. > Having read the mails in your url I noticed the > mention of the option: > > DYLD_BIND_AT_LAUNCH=YES > > to get by this issue. Does this work? Have you tried? > No, I didn't try it. If I have time, i'll give it a look. But not in the very near future... Cheers Damir
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:12 MET