Hi Thomas, I finally tracked down the problem and Masa was able to fix it. The fix is in the CVS repository. Please give it a try and let's me know. Cheers, Philippe -----Original Message----- From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch [mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]On Behalf Of Thomas Bretz Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:00 AM To: Philippe Canal Cc: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch Subject: Re: [ROOT] operator<< not defined in the Interpreter Hi Philippe, but I think this are the same operators than I use for cout. This works. BTW: As I mentioned before, it was working in earlier root versions. And all the operators should be in the dictionary, because I can use these operators for any iostream or fstream, which are based on these operators. So for me it seems, that the interpreter doesn't cast (it is not really a cast, is it?) my object correctly to its base class and finds the correspoding operator. So in my opinion it is a bug in the interpreter that it doesn't recognize and use the operators of the ofstream classes correctly. Regards, Thoms. Philippe Canal wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > You need to also create the dictionary entries for the operator<<s (I think > :) ). > > Cheers, > Philippe. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > [mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]On Behalf Of Thomas Bretz > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:09 AM > To: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > Subject: [ROOT] operator<< not defined in the Interpreter > > > Dear all, > > I have created a class which is derived from ostream and streambuf, it's > name is MLog (The idea is to redirect a stream to file, a TGText or any > other output, at the same time). I create a global instance of this > class called gLog. > > Both, the class and the instance are exported by: > #pragma link C++ class MLog+; > #pragma link C++ global gLog; > > This worked fine with root 3.02/07. But now I'm using root 3.05/05 and > calling: > gLog << "Test" << endl; > in the interpreter results in: > Error: operator<< not defined for MLog FILE:(tmpfile) LINE:1 > *** Interpreter error recovered *** > > BTW: It would be nice if the error messages of the Interpreter would be > a bit more clear... > > Does somebody have any idea? > > Thanks, > Thomas. > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:13 MET