Re: [ROOT] differences between TDatime::TDatime(UInt_t) and TDatime::Set(UInt_t)?

From: Rene Brun (Rene.Brun@cern.ch)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 21:33:27 MEST

Next message: zaldy: "Re: [ROOT] Deriving a class after using Makeclass"
Previous message: Dr. John Krane: "[ROOT] whoops!"
In reply to: David Faden: "[ROOT] differences between TDatime::TDatime(UInt_t) and TDatime::Set(UInt_t)?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi david,

This problem had already been fixed.
Take a recent version or wait for version 3.05/06 coming at the end
of this week.

Rene Brun

On Tue, 
15 Jul 2003, David Faden 
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Should a TDatime initialized with a UInt_t be identical in value to a 
> TDatime that has been Set to that same UInt_t? This doesn't appear to 
> be the case:
> 
> root [0] UInt_t t = 1000
> root [1] TDatime d1(t)
> root [2] d1.AsString()
> (const char* 0x40c59620)"Wed Nov 30 00:15:40 1994"
> root [3] TDatime d2
> root [4] d2.Set(t)
> root [5] d2.AsString()
> (const char* 0x40c59620)"Sat Dec 31 19:16:40 2033"
> 
> If the above is the expected behavior, what is the crucial difference 
> between initializing to a certain value and Setting to a certain value?
> 
> The above was run under ROOT version 3.01/05 13 March 2002 under Linux. 
> (Sorry, I'm unsure of the vendor -- probably Red Hat.)
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> David
> 
>

Next message: zaldy: "Re: [ROOT] Deriving a class after using Makeclass"
Previous message: Dr. John Krane: "[ROOT] whoops!"
In reply to: David Faden: "[ROOT] differences between TDatime::TDatime(UInt_t) and TDatime::Set(UInt_t)?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:13 MET