Hi Philippe, > As far as ROOT I/O is concerned, the mutable keyword is ignored. I was sure that it is not ignored. I did a simple test now and found: mutable was written an read properly. So mutable keyword is ignored but member not. > (And actually you will be surprised that some developpers __do__ > want to save their mutable data members! Actually it needs some efforts do NOT save them. I think there is nothing wrong in saving mutable, if user does not want to save, he can use // ! flag. Victor Victor M. Perevoztchikov perev@bnl.gov Brookhaven National Laboratory MS 510A PO Box 5000 Upton NY 11973-5000 tel office : 631-344-7894; fax 631-344-4206; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Canal" <pcanal@fnal.gov> To: "David Chamont" <david.chamont@laposte.net>; <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: [ROOT] mutable > Hi David, > > As far as ROOT I/O is concerned, the mutable keyword is ignored. > (And actually you will be surprised that some developpers __do__ > want to save their mutable data members! So we would not be able > to rely on that information) > > Cheers, > Philippe. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > [mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]On Behalf Of David Chamont > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:11 AM > To: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > Subject: [ROOT] mutable > > > Hi Root Gurus, > > What is the current level of support for the keyword "mutable" ? > How ROOT I/O is reacting to such an attribute when saving > an object : is it saved or is it ignored just like file://! ? > > David. > > ################################################################# > ################################################################# > ################################################################# > ##### > ##### > ##### > ################################################################# > ################################################################# > ################################################################# >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:50:14 MET