Hi Thomas,
I've added support for *TOGGLE* without the need for a matching data
member. To do what you want see this piece of cvs log:
add support for *TOGGLE* context menu methods that are not related to a
data member with the same name (e.g. a method that changes a bit in a
data member with a different name). For these methods one can add the
comment option:
*GETTER=<getter-method>
to say what the getter method to use, like:
void SetNoExponent(Bool_t noex=kTRUE); //*TOGGLE* *GETTER=GetNoExponent
So in your case:
void SetMyBit(Bool_t b) { ...; } //*TOGGLE* *GETTER=IsMyBit
should do the trick.
Cheers, Fons.
> Hi all,
>
> why does this functionality need a existing data-member, eg
> Bool_t fMyBit;
>
> Isn't it enough if the corresponding Set, Get/Is functions are
> available, eg:
> void SetMyBit(Bool_t b) { b ? SetBit(1<<14) : ResetBit(1<<14); } >
//*TOGGLE*
> Bool_t IsMyBit() const { return TestBit(1<<14); }
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas.
--
Org: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics.
Mail: 1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
E-Mail: Fons.Rademakers@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7679248
WWW: http://www.rademakers.org/fons/ Fax: +41 22 7679480
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:06 MET