Hi Rene! I dont use CINT, I compile my program. If you want to have a closer look, tell me, what further details you need. (I also could send you my program...) to Olivier: I didnt check it explicitly, whether TLatex worked where TText failed. I just kept in mind, that I didnt encounter segmentation violations with TLatex. So I assume, that I will see the same problem with TLatex and TText, as you do. Since TLatex inherits from TText. Bernd. -----Original Message----- From: Rene Brun on behalf of Rene Brun Sent: Tue 4/20/2004 6:28 PM To: Olivier Couet Cc: Bernd Reinhold; roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch Subject: Re: [ROOT] auto-wrapping Bernd, This is a CINT limitation for the length of the constant strings. Instead of an explicit string like you do, use a variable like in the example in the attachement Rene Brun Olivier Couet wrote: > > Hi Bernd, > > Well, not for me. In the little example I sent you if you replace TText > by TLatex it crashes too with string longer than 283 characters. > > Cheers, Olivier > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bernd Reinhold wrote: > > > Hi Olivier! > > > > > > TLatex worked where TText failed (at least for the example below). But has it a limit, too? > > > > Cheers, Bernd. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Olivier Couet > > Sent: Tue 4/20/2004 4:38 PM > > To: Bernd Reinhold > > Cc: Olivier Couet; roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch > > Subject: RE: [ROOT] auto-wrapping > > > > Hi Bernd, > > > > Yes it seems there is some limit. I can produce a crash with the following > > macro: > > > > { > > TText t(0.,0," > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX... // 284 X make it crash 283 is fine > > "); > > } > > > > I do not know why yet ... > > > > Cheers, Olivier > > > > > > -- > Org: CERN - European Laboratory for Particle Physics. > Mail: 1211 Geneve 23 - Switzerland Mailbox: J25910 > E-Mail: Olivier.Couet@cern.ch Phone: +41 22 7676522 > WWW: http://cern.ch/Olivier.Couet/ Fax: +41 22 7677155
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:07 MET