Re: [ROOT] TArrayI code change

From: Gero Flucke (gero.flucke@desy.de)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 10:42:56 MEST


On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Rene Brun wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Sorry for the wrong information. The CVS log for revision 1.17 is not
> correct. The problem in TArrayI was introduced in revision 1.11 (10 June 2002)
> corresponding to ROOT version 3.02/06 and fixed only on 5 April 2004.
> The 3.10 binaries on the web do not contain this fix.
>
Hi Rene,
now I am confused: The HTML-docu of releases 3.02, 3.04 and 3.05
represent correct code, only 3.10 is wrong. If I remember right, the
complain about the bug was reported for 3.10_2, claiming 3.10_1 was still
correct:
http://root.cern.ch/root/roottalk/roottalk04/1101.html

Cheers
	Gero

> Rene Brun
>
> Edward Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi - according to CVS:
> >
> > http://root.cern.ch/viewcvs/cont/inc/TArrayI.h
> >
> > fixed problem with Reset() introduced in version v3-10-01a and higher,
> > don't use memset to set array to non 0 values (memset sets bytes, not
> > integers).
> >
> > The problem appears to have been introduced earlier than that.
> >
> > -Ed
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Rene Brun wrote:
> >
> > > Ed,
> > >
> > > Version 3.10/02 of TArrayI::Reset was OK. The problem was introduced in
> > > 4.00/00 and fixed in 4.00/03
> > >
> > > Rene Brun
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Edward Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi - I was wondering if the builds of 3.10/02 available on the ROOT
> > > > website include the fix to TArrayI::Reset() for non-zero values?  Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > -Ed
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:07 MET