On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Rene Brun wrote: > Hi Ed, > > Sorry for the wrong information. The CVS log for revision 1.17 is not > correct. The problem in TArrayI was introduced in revision 1.11 (10 June 2002) > corresponding to ROOT version 3.02/06 and fixed only on 5 April 2004. > The 3.10 binaries on the web do not contain this fix. > Hi Rene, now I am confused: The HTML-docu of releases 3.02, 3.04 and 3.05 represent correct code, only 3.10 is wrong. If I remember right, the complain about the bug was reported for 3.10_2, claiming 3.10_1 was still correct: http://root.cern.ch/root/roottalk/roottalk04/1101.html Cheers Gero > Rene Brun > > Edward Chen wrote: > > > > Hi - according to CVS: > > > > http://root.cern.ch/viewcvs/cont/inc/TArrayI.h > > > > fixed problem with Reset() introduced in version v3-10-01a and higher, > > don't use memset to set array to non 0 values (memset sets bytes, not > > integers). > > > > The problem appears to have been introduced earlier than that. > > > > -Ed > > > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Rene Brun wrote: > > > > > Ed, > > > > > > Version 3.10/02 of TArrayI::Reset was OK. The problem was introduced in > > > 4.00/00 and fixed in 4.00/03 > > > > > > Rene Brun > > > > > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Edward Chen wrote: > > > > > > > Hi - I was wondering if the builds of 3.10/02 available on the ROOT > > > > website include the fix to TArrayI::Reset() for non-zero values? Thanks. > > > > > > > > -Ed > > > > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:07 MET