Hi Valeri,
great, that's doing the job. What is the disadvantage of disabling the
double buffering?
Thomas.
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Valeri Fine wrote:
> O I have realixe a typo in my message
> I wrote
>
> GetWindow
>
> It should be GetWindowID() of course
>
> http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/src/TGX11.cxx.html#TGX11:GetWindowID
>
> It should help.
>
>
> ----
> Best regards
> Valeri
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Bretz [mailto:Thomas_Bretz@ph.tum.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 1:27 PM
> > To: Valeri Fine
> > Cc: 'Thomas Bretz'; roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
> > Subject: RE: [ROOT] gVirtualX->PutImage and TCanvas
> >
> > Hi Valeri,
> >
> > thanks a lot for the fast help, I'll try it and report. However I'll
> > copy my code to this eMail that you can have a look.
> >
> > class MImage2 : public TObject
> > {
> > XImage *fImage;
> >
> > GContext_t fDefGC;
> >
> > Int_t fId;
> > UInt_t fWidth;
> > UInt_t fHeight;
> >
> > void DrawImg24(char *d, char *s, char *e);
> >
> > public:
> > MImage2(UInt_t w, UInt_t h);
> > ~MImage2();
> >
> > void Paint(Option_t *o);
> >
> > void DrawImg(const byte *buffer);
> >
> > ClassDef(MImage2, 0)
> > };
> > MImage2::MImage2(UInt_t w, UInt_t h)
> > : fId(gClient->GetRoot()->GetId()), fWidth(w), fHeight(h)
> > {
> > // p = pointer to MainFrame (not owner)
> > // w = width of frame
> > // h = width of frame
> >
> > fDefGC = gVirtualX->CreateGC(fId, 0);
> > fImage = (XImage*)gVirtualX->CreateImage(fWidth, fHeight);
> >
> > cout << "Detected Color Depth: " << gVirtualX->GetDepth() << endl;
> > if (gVirtualX->GetDepth()!=24)
> > cout << "WARNING this class only works with 24bit color
> depth!" <<
> > endl;
> > }
> >
> > MImage2::~MImage2()
> > {
> > gVirtualX->DeleteGC(fDefGC);
> > gVirtualX->DeleteImage((Drawable_t)fImage);
> > }
> >
> > void MImage2::Paint(Option_t *o)
> > {
> > gVirtualX->PutImage(fId, fDefGC, (Drawable_t)fImage, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > fWidth, fHeight);
> > }
> >
> > void MImage2::DrawImg24(char *d, char *s, char *e)
> > {
> > // d=destination, s=source, e=end
> > // rrrrrrrr gggggggg bbbbbbbb aaaaaaaa
> > //
> > while (s<e)
> > {
> > *d++ = *s;
> > *d++ = *s;
> > *d++ = *s++;
> > d++;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > void MImage2::DrawImg(const byte *buffer)
> > {
> > DrawImg24(fImage->data, (char*)buffer,
> > (char*)(buffer+fWidth*fHeight));
> > }
> > void test()
> > {
> > TCanvas *c=new TCanvas;
> >
> > MImage2 *i = new MImage2(100, 100);
> >
> > byte buf[100*100];
> >
> > for (int j=0; j<100*100; j++)
> > buf[j]=j;
> >
> > i->DrawImg(buf);
> > i->Draw();
> > }
> >
> > Thomas,.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 4 May 2004,
> > Valeri Fine wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello Thomas.
> > >
> > > It is hard to advice without your code and running example.
> > > ( I did not see your source so I am still guessing :-)
> > >
> > > Anyway in your Paint method you may try to do something like this
> > >
> > > void MImage::Paint( . . . ) {
> > >
> > > Window_t fid = gVitualX->GetWindow(gPad->GetPixmaID());
> > > gVirtualX->PutImage(fid, < . . . other PutImage parameters . .
> . >
> > > )
> > >
> > > }
> > > If you still need speed you may regard to disable the double
> buffering
> > > to paint the TCanvas screen directly replacing
> > >
> > > gPad->GetPixmapID()
> > >
> > > http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/TPad.html#TPad:GetPixmapID
> > >
> > > with gpad->GetCanvasID();
> > >
> > > http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/TPad.html#TPad:GetCanvasID
> > > http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/TCanvas.html#TCanvas:GetCanvasID
> > > abd applying
> > > http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/TGX11.html#TGX11:SetDoubleBuffer
> > > method.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope this helps.
> > > Valeri
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Thomas Bretz [mailto:Thomas_Bretz@ph.tum.de]
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:04 PM
> > > > To: Valeri Fine
> > > > Cc: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
> > > > Subject: RE: [ROOT] gVirtualX->PutImage and TCanvas
> > > >
> > > > Hi Valeri,
> > > >
> > > > > Did I understand correctly that you tried to use
> > > > >
> http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/TVirtualX.html#TVirtualX:PutImage
> > > > > method to paint TCanvas ?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, you are right.
> > > >
> > > > > I am afraid this method can not be used to paint TCanvas / TPad
> > > > > To do that you have to provide the "Drawable_t id" for TPad.
> > > > > As soon as I know there is no method to do that.
> > > > > One can get the "Drawable_t" for the parent widget of TCanvas.
> > > > > However it is not the TCanvas itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > With TCanvas the best thing you can do, you can draw the parent
> > > widget
> > > > > using PutImage method, but then ROOT will paint the real and
> empty
> > > > > TCanvas/TPad over.
> > > >
> > > > That exactly seems to be my problem.
> > > >
> > > > > To do what you want you should regard using the TGFrame object
> > > rather
> > > > > TCanvas/TPad. Then you can apply PutImage method to paint it.
> > > > > (see:
> > > > >
> > >
> http://root.cern.ch/root/htmldoc/src/TGColorPick.cxx.html#TGColorPick:Do
> > > > > Redraw
> > > > > for example)
> > > >
> > > > I know. This is exactly where my problem comes from. I have a
> > > > sky-coordinate system grid which is painted using TLine - which
> > > becuase of
> > > > the nice features of TPad is necessary. In a different application
> I
> > > > readout a CCD camera of a sky image and I want to underlay this
> CCD
> > > image
> > > > (768x576x8bit, 25fps) This must be done with less than 1% CPU on a
> > > 1.5GHz
> > > > linux machine. I know that the algorithm (with PutImage) is
> working
> > > very
> > > > fast and well in my TGFrame application, but now I want to have
> both.
> > > The
> > > > nice and fast PutImage and the powerfull class drawing the grid.
> > > >
> > > > > Another way to manage thing is to provide your own
> implementation of
> > > > > TImage abstract ROOT class using the existent TASImage
> > > implementation as
> > > > > a pattern
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > With the mixed Qt/ROOT env you can just apply the class
> > > > > http://doc.trolltech.com/3.3/qmovie.html to paint the TCanvas
> /TPad
> > > as
> > > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > I have two classes already available which servs for different
> > > > necessarities. I think developing a new class would not make
> sense.
> > > I'm
> > > > just triing to write a simple interface to merge the display of
> both.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Thomas.
> > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
> > > > > [mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch] On
> > > > > > Behalf Of Thomas Bretz
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 4:36 PM
> > > > > > To: Valeriy Onuchin
> > > > > > Cc: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [ROOT] gVirtualX->PutImage and TCanvas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > sorry, I don't know what happened. I hope this time they are
> > > complete.
> > > > > > Thomas.
> > > > > > On
> > > > > > Mon, 3 May 2004, Valeriy Onuchin wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > > > > two files in attachment are empty.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards. Valeriy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Thomas Bretz" <Thomas_Bretz@ph.tum.de>
> > > > > > > To: <roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:45 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: [ROOT] gVirtualX->PutImage and TCanvas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > with the (very simple) attached class I try to display a
> gray
> > > > > scaled
> > > > > > > > bitmap in a canvas. It doesn't work. Can somebody explain
> me,
> > > what
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > > > doing wrong?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (I'm developing this class, because I need a really fast
> > > access to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > screen - 25fps - which I think I won't get with the big
> > > overgead
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > TASImage)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > > > Thomas.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ------
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > void test()
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > TCanvas *c=new TCanvas;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > MImage2 *i = new MImage2(100, 100);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > byte buf[100*100];
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for (int j=0; j<100*100; j++)
> > > > > > > > buf[j]=j;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i->DrawImg(buf);
> > > > > > > > i->Draw();
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > Würden Sie Windows 95 die Kontrolle eines AKWs überlassen?
> > > > > > Hiroshima '45...! Tschernobyl '86...!! Windows 95...!!!
> > > > > > Unix ist benutzerfreundlich - es ist nur etwas wählerisch..."
> > > (Walter
> > > > > Misar)
> > > > > > Was sagt ein arbeitsloser Physiker zu einem Physiker mit
> Arbeit?
> > > > > > - "Eine Currywurst mit Pommes bitte!"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > > > Würden Sie Windows 95 die Kontrolle eines AKWs überlassen?
> > > > Hiroshima '45...! Tschernobyl '86...!! Windows 95...!!!
> > > > Unix ist benutzerfreundlich - es ist nur etwas wählerisch..."
> (Walter
> > > Misar)
> > > > Was sagt ein arbeitsloser Physiker zu einem Physiker mit Arbeit?
> > > > - "Eine Currywurst mit Pommes bitte!"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -----
> > Würden Sie Windows 95 die Kontrolle eines AKWs überlassen?
> > Hiroshima '45...! Tschernobyl '86...!! Windows 95...!!!
> > Unix ist benutzerfreundlich - es ist nur etwas wählerisch..." (Walter
> Misar)
> > Was sagt ein arbeitsloser Physiker zu einem Physiker mit Arbeit?
> > - "Eine Currywurst mit Pommes bitte!"
>
>
>
-----
Würden Sie Windows 95 die Kontrolle eines AKWs überlassen?
Hiroshima '45...! Tschernobyl '86...!! Windows 95...!!!
Unix ist benutzerfreundlich - es ist nur etwas wählerisch..." (Walter Misar)
Was sagt ein arbeitsloser Physiker zu einem Physiker mit Arbeit?
- "Eine Currywurst mit Pommes bitte!"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:07 MET