RE: [ROOT] macosx status?

From: Valeri Fine (fine@bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Aug 20 2004 - 15:30:52 MEST


Hello. It is well-known Mac feature

Read
http://root.cern.ch/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=882
 It says, 
" . . . 

A side effect is now that you need to have set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH to
include $ROOTSYS/lib BEFORE building ROOT. I'll change this later, but
for you to build make sure that DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is correctly set.

 . . . "

  Hope this helps, Valeri

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
[mailto:owner-roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch]
> On Behalf Of troy d. straszheim
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 8:59 AM
> To: roottalk@pcroot.cern.ch
> Subject: [ROOT] macosx status?
> 
> Hi roottalk--
> 
> Does anybody happen to know the status of mac versions of root?  On my
> 10.3 machine, the 4.00.08 source tarball fails to compile with
> 
> ld: warning can't open dynamic library:
> /usr/local/root-v4-00-08a/lib/root/libfreetype.dylib (checking for
> undefined symbols may be affected) (No such file or directory, errno =
> 2)
> ld: Undefined symbols:
> _FT_Done_Face
> _FT_Done_FreeType
> _FT_Done_Glyph
> _FT_Get_Char_Index
> _FT_Get_Glyph
> 
> whether or not freetype is installed via fink.  The
> installed-directly-through-fink version has given me various problems,
> and the binary distribution has /Users/rdm compiled in to it,
requiring
> one to make links and variously munge the installation.
> 
> Might I ask if anyone uses root on OSX regularly, and if so what
> version of root are they using and briefly what installation method
was
> used?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -t



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:09 MET