Tomasz,
I forwarded your problem to Masa and he answered the following:
>
> I was looking at this problem. It is a problem of pointer to function.
> Let me think how to solve it. I am thinking about re-engineering
> pointer to function mechanism. I need to decide whether to use
> new scheme in legacy code for fixing this.
>
> Thank you
> Masa Goto
>
Rene Brun
On
Mon, 27
Sep 2004, Tomasz Bold wrote:
> HI,
> I do not know whether my mail was filtered as spam or whatever
> but I submit the example of functions ptrs again.
>
> Regards,
> Tomasz Bold
>
>
> --------------------------------------
> Tomasz Bold
> mail me:
> bold@ftj.agh.edu.pl,
> Tomasz.Bold@cern.ch
> Tomasz.Bold@desy.de
> or call:
> +48 12 617 4729 (AGH)
> +48 12 662 8023 (IFJ)
> -------------------------------------
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Rene Brun wrote:
>
> > Tomasz,
> >
> > Could you send the shortest possible running script reproducing this problem?
> >
> > Rene brun
> >
> > Tomasz Bold wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear ROOTers,
> > > I want to perform number of fits. The functions which are supposed
> > > to be fitted are plain c coded.
> > > I wanted to put pointers to this functions in the table and the
> > > loop over this table and do following:
> > > 1. create TF1 with function from table (double) (*)(double *, double *)
> > > 2. fit TF1
> > > 3. go to 1
> > >
> > > Unfotunelly I can't deal with table of pointers to plain C functions.
> > > I have functions defined in the *.C file which I load with ACLIC.
> > >
> > > In the code there is table to functions
> > > ...
> > > functions defined
> > > ...
> > > typedef Double_t (*ff_t) ( Double_t *x, Double_t *par);
> > > ff_t pileupscanfun[] = { pileupscanfun0, pileupscanfun1, pileupscanfun2}
> > >
> > > But when I type following then I can't understand the result.
> > >
> > > root [0] .L pileupscanfunAll.C++
> > > Info in <TUnixSystem::ACLiC>: creating shared library
> > > /home/bold/dokt/thesis/root/DESY-07-2004/MC/nowe/ep27.5/./pileupscanfunAll_C.so
> > > root [1] pileupscanfun0
> > > (const void*)0x4175a728
> > > root [2] pileupscanfun[0]
> > > Error: Symbol pileupscanfun[0] is not defined in current scope
> > > FILE:(tmpfile) LINE:1
> > > *** Interpreter error recovered ***
> > >
> > > Any idea how to deal with the problem? Or do fits in loop in other way?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tomaks Bold
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Tomasz Bold
> > > mail me:
> > > bold@ftj.agh.edu.pl,
> > > Tomasz.Bold@cern.ch
> > > Tomasz.Bold@desy.de
> > > or call:
> > > +48 12 617 4729 (AGH)
> > > +48 12 662 8023 (IFJ)
> > > -------------------------------------
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2005 - 05:50:09 MET