Re: Re: Make Redhat (again..)

Hi Fons,

On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 22:27 +0200, Fons Rademakers wrote:
> Hi Germano,
>
> thanks for investigating this. Your assumption about Foam is correct. It
> is an auxiliary package but not a plugin and should as be considered like
> libMatrix et al.

OK, so it shouldn't live in it's own package - Is that correct?

I really think it would be a good idea to formulate what is the core of ROOT, and what isn't.

I would have assumed that the FOAM library is not part of the core or ROOT, and as such should go into a separate package.

libMatrix is needed by the core classes of ROOT. For example, the library libHist contains TPrincipal, which uses TMatrixDSym.  

> Christian, I assume you will check the patch and tell me what to check-in
> in cvs.

Unless you want to put FOAM in a separate package, I believe the patch is OK.

Yours,

-- 
 ___  |  Christian Holm Christensen 
  |_| |  -------------------------------------------------------------
    | |  Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th.  Phone:  (+45) 35 35 96 91
     _|           DK-2200 Copenhagen N       Cell:   (+45) 24 61 85 91
    _|            Denmark                    Office: (+45) 353  25 404
 ____|   Email:   cholm_at_nbi.dk               Web:    www.nbi.dk/~cholm
 | |