RE: Chi2Test

From: Rene Brun <brun_at_pcroot.cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:04:10 +0200 (MEST)


Hi Gero,

Thanks for your comments.
It would be nice if an expert in statistics (if possible with experience with KolmogorovTest and Chi2Test) could write some lines on the virtues/problems of the two methods. I will add these comments in the documentation of the two functions.

Rene Brun

On
Thu,
11
Aug 2005, Gero Flucke wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Rene Brun wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Jan Conrad wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Root-developers,
>>>
>>> two suggestions:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> 2) having Chi2Test in place, maybe it is time to get rid of the
>>> Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for
>>> histograms ?
>>
>> I dont't think that users will appreciate this proposal.
>> Could you comment on the relative merits/drawbacks of the two approaches.
>> I will add your comment in the KolmogorovTest functions.
>
> Hi Jan and Rene,
> so far I neither used the chi2Test nor the KolmogorovTest, but as far as I
> know from statistics, Kolmogorov is superior to chi2 in that sense that it
> is sensitive to differences in shape while chi2 is better in taking into
> account the histogram errors. So both tests have their own validity.
>
> Cheers
>
> Gero
>
Received on Thu Aug 11 2005 - 11:04:17 MEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 14:45:11 MET