Re: gfortran, Mac OS X and -fno-second-underscore

Dear Tim,

As to your question if there is a reason to prefer the att gfortran over the macreaserch gfortran, I got the following answer: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mac/2010-January/007060.html

So it seems that it is advisable to use the gfortran complier from att.

Best regards
Christian

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
C.h.r.i.s.t.i.a.n   S.t.r.a.t.o.w.a
V.i.e.n.n.a           A.u.s.t.r.i.a
e.m.a.i.l:        cstrato at aon.at
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

Tim Head wrote:
> Hello Dario,
>
> On 29 January 2010 09:29, Dario Berzano <berzano_at_to.infn.it> wrote:
>
>> As Mac users know well, gfortran is not provided along with Apple
>> Developer Tools. Generally, the solution is to install the whole gcc,
>> including gfortran, with Fink or MacPorts.
>>
>> However, on this web page - http://r.research.att.com/tools/ - only the
>> missing gfortran matching your gcc version provided with Apple Developer
>> Tools can be found.
>>
>>
>
> As a new mac user I learnt this the other day. Is there a reason to
> prefer the att gfortran over the one from
> http://www.macresearch.org/gfortran-leopard ?
>
> Using the one from macresearch root builds fine for me on snow leopard.
>
> Tim
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 29 2010 - 20:36:06 CET