Re: AW: AW: AW: problem compiling with PROOF and stdio.h

 > Just to be sure: I CAN do TChain.Process(&selector) from a "normal" ROOT session?

Yes.

Cheers,
Philippe.

On 2/9/10 10:33 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
>
> On 02/09/2010 05:28 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > This is not true. I did already process a TChain with Proof and a
>> Class created by MakeProxy ;-)
>>
>> Yes again I was imprecise :(
>>
>> More precisely, I meant that for a TChain you can call Process with a
>> filename ("MySelector.C+") both
>> in the local and Proof case but you can Process with a TSelector
>> pointer ( &myselector ) only if you do not use Proof. :)
>
> Just to be sure: I CAN do TChain.Process(&selector) from a "normal"
> ROOT session?
>
>>
>> > Yes, this was exactly what I was searching. However, this is only
>> possible for PROOF-sessions. What do I do if I run the code without
>> proof? Passing one string is not that much.
>>
>> Unfortunately, you will need to use two different code path. For
>> the non-proof case, you could create the TSelector before hand
>> and set its parameter in place while using the input list for the
>> proof case.
>>
> This indeed solves my problem. I will have a try with that. Thanks a
> lot for your patience.
>
> Cheers,
> Kathrin
>
>> Cheers,
>> Philippe.
>>
>> On 2/9/10 10:17 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2010 04:51 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>
>>>> > thanks, I just was confused because there is written on the
>>>> manual that the TTree-arguement is "no longer used" for PROOF.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it is for the function Begin and SlaveBegin but it is still
>>>> used for Init as the documentation points out:
>>>>
>>>> > The tree argument is deprecated. (In the case of PROOF the tree
>>>> is not available on the client and 0 will be passed. The Init()
>>>> function should be used to implement operations depending on the tree)
>>>>
>>>> > You said, for TChains it is not possible to call Process with a
>>>> previously created selector directly.
>>>>
>>>> More precisely, I meant that for a TChain you can call Process only
>>>> if you do not use Proof.
>>> This is not true. I did already process a TChain with Proof and a
>>> Class created by MakeProxy ;-) As far as I can tell, it seemed to
>>> work. Looks like it splits automatically the chain back into single
>>> trees. Is there any reason why it should not work?
>>>>
>>>> > Do I miss something here? Any suggestions would be helpful.
>>>>
>>>> You can pass information through the 'input list' see
>>>> http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/controlling-proof-behaviour-input-list
>>>>
>>>> for some information (for example you can use a TParameter or a
>>>> TObjString).
>>>> Also you can pass a string option in the call to Process (the 2nd
>>>> parameter).
>>> Yes, this was exactly what I was searching. However, this is only
>>> possible for PROOF-sessions. What do I do if I run the code without
>>> proof? Passing one string is not that much.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kathrin
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Philippe.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/9/10 6:18 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks, I just was confused because there is written on the manual
>>>>> that the TTree-arguement is "no longer used" for PROOF.
>>>>>
>>>>> One last question:
>>>>> You said, for TChains it is not possible to call Process with a
>>>>> previously created selector directly. So, how am I then supposed
>>>>> to pass certain arguements to this selector (besides the
>>>>> predefined ones). I thought of something like normalization or
>>>>> some kind of switches??
>>>>> Let me give an example:
>>>>> Create a TSelector, add some functions like
>>>>> TSelector.SetArguements(weight=2, isBatch=true, ...)... and then
>>>>> pass it to TTree/TChain tree.Process(&selector).
>>>>> Now, that I can not Process(&selector) with a chain, two solutions
>>>>> come to my mind (but I might be wrong):
>>>>> - either I split the chain up in trees and do seperate calls for
>>>>> tree.Process(&selector) but this would somehow ignore the things,
>>>>> PROOF could do for me I guess
>>>>> - or there is a way to pass arguements from the commandline to
>>>>> tChain.Process("macro.C++"). I already tried
>>>>> "macro.C++(parameters)" like you could do it from the command line
>>>>> when starting root but it didn't work for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do I miss something here? Any suggestions would be helpful.
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/08/2010 10:21 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That depends from where :). In a MakeProxy, you can use fChain
>>>>>> if you need to. In a MakeSelector same thing.
>>>>>> Otherwise, you would capture it by copying the argument pass to
>>>>>> the Init function of the selector.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/8/10 11:19 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> one more maybe stupid question: How do I access the current
>>>>>>> TTree inside proof?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 02/05/2010 09:49 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are still interested and want to track this bug, I can
>>>>>>>>> test with my
>>>>>>>>> old class line-by-line what causes this strange behavior
>>>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, I am happy that it is vanished now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If _and only_ if you have some time, this might be interesting
>>>>>>>> to know what the cause was
>>>>>>>> since we do expect any of our changes to have made a difference
>>>>>>>> (and thus there is some
>>>>>>>> change that the problem is just 'hiding'). However I also
>>>>>>>> expect that this problem is due
>>>>>>>> to a build problem (i.e. it might not come back :)) so I don't
>>>>>>>> think that this is important :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > By the way, why has TChain no method Process(&TSelector)? -
>>>>>>>> This is one of
>>>>>>>> > the recommendations I found on TTree-Docu in order to process
>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>> > times..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TChain does have a method Long64_t TChain::Process(TSelector*
>>>>>>>> selector, Option_t* option, Long64_t nentries, Long64_t
>>>>>>>> firstentry)
>>>>>>>> .... However it is _not_ supported in Proof mode.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/5/10 2:41 PM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Philippe,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think you finally solved my problem :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I installed your updated ROOT-version and now my
>>>>>>>>> compiler-problems vanishes
>>>>>>>>> magically.
>>>>>>>>> I get exactly the same segfault of slave as you now, therefore
>>>>>>>>> I will start
>>>>>>>>> rebuilding my classes from the new MakeProxy-method.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried your stdio-example and I can confirm your expectation.
>>>>>>>>> It works
>>>>>>>>> besides the "missing" TSelector.
>>>>>>>>> If you are still interested and want to track this bug, I can
>>>>>>>>> test with my
>>>>>>>>> old class line-by-line what causes this strange behavior
>>>>>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, I am happy that it is vanished now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By the way, why has TChain no method Process(&TSelector)? -
>>>>>>>>> This is one of
>>>>>>>>> the recommendations I found on TTree-Docu in order to process
>>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>> times..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers and many thanks again,
>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>>>>> Von: Philippe Canal [mailto:pcanal_at_fnal.gov]
>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 20:45
>>>>>>>>> An: Kathrin Stoerig
>>>>>>>>> Cc: 'ganis'
>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [ROOT] problem compiling with PROOF and
>>>>>>>>> stdio.h
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I did try your example. The file proxyWD3PD.C does shows that
>>>>>>>>> expected
>>>>>>>>> (run-time segmentation
>>>>>>>>> fault of the slave) and if I regenerate the proxy, it compiled
>>>>>>>>> and works
>>>>>>>>> properly out of the box.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I was _unable_ to reproduce your compilation failure ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When you get a change to try again I recommend to try a simple
>>>>>>>>> test with
>>>>>>>>> a file containing
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #include<stdio.h>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> as the file that you pass to Process with Proof enabled. The
>>>>>>>>> correct
>>>>>>>>> behavior in that case
>>>>>>>>> is no compilation error and a message complaining the library
>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>> contain a TSelector object.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If this test succeed, then you should try to remove from
>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD.C
>>>>>>>>> and proxyWD3PD.h
>>>>>>>>> code until the compilation succeeds and send me the broken
>>>>>>>>> result.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/10 12:02 PM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello Phillipe,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I did not have the time for testing your new ROOT version
>>>>>>>>>> yet, but I
>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>> put my basic code under (I hope this is everything you need):
>>>>>>>>>> https://james.physik.uni-freiburg.de/~stoerig/public/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers and many thanks for the help,
>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>>>>>> Von: Philippe Canal [mailto:pcanal_at_fnal.gov]
>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 13:40
>>>>>>>>>> An: Kathrin Stoerig
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: 'ganis'
>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: [ROOT] problem compiling with PROOF and stdio.h
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What do you mean by running PROOF "locally"? This is what
>>>>>>>>>>> I always do,
>>>>>>>>>>> running only on my local computer (2cores, 2 workernodes).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That is what I meant ... So I am not sure what the problem
>>>>>>>>>> was and
>>>>>>>>>> whether or not the
>>>>>>>>>> change I made address it. If you send me a complete running
>>>>>>>>>> example, I
>>>>>>>>>> will try to
>>>>>>>>>> reproduce your error messages ....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/10 4:00 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am on shift for the next days, but afterwards I promise I
>>>>>>>>>>> will have a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> with the new version.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What do you mean by running PROOF "locally"? This is what I
>>>>>>>>>>> always do,
>>>>>>>>>>> running only on my local computer (2cores, 2 workernodes).
>>>>>>>>>>> If your question aims whether I can run at all any code with
>>>>>>>>>>> proof, yes,
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> can. I tried successfully to reproduce the example class
>>>>>>>>>>> from the ATLAS
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SUSY
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> D3PD maker, which is based on MakeSelector.
>>>>>>>>>>> (https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/SUSYD3PDMaker).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>>>>>>> Von: Philippe Canal [mailto:pcanal_at_fnal.gov]
>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 23:38
>>>>>>>>>>> An: Kathrin Stoerig
>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: ganis
>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [ROOT] problem compiling with PROOF and stdio.h
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It turns out that a couple of things in MakeProxy were not
>>>>>>>>>>> playing nice
>>>>>>>>>>> with PROOF.
>>>>>>>>>>> I updated the trunk (revision 32218) and now the result of
>>>>>>>>>>> MakeProxy
>>>>>>>>>>> does work
>>>>>>>>>>> (for me) with Proof. Could you give it a try?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> However the problem I found are (seemingly) unrelated to the
>>>>>>>>>>> problem you
>>>>>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try running first PROOF with a local session? (I am
>>>>>>>>>>> suspecting
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>> install problem with the worker node's compiler ...).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/10 9:34 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Phillipe,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> oh, sorry for the confusion, D3PDBase derives from proxyWD3PD.
>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD is (with small modifications) what came out of
>>>>>>>>>>>> TChain.MakeProxy().
>>>>>>>>>>>> But, nevertheless, the errors look just the same for using
>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am more surprised by the fact, that it compiles without
>>>>>>>>>>>> any problems
>>>>>>>>>>>> inside ROOT directly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: errors for proxyWD3PD
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PD.h proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_linkdef.h:8:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: Link requested for already precompiled class
>>>>>>>>>>>> vector<float,allocator<float> > (ignore this message) :0:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:909,
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.h:11,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.cxx:16:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h: In function ‘__ssize_t
>>>>>>>>>>>> getline(char**,
>>>>>>>>>>>> size_t*, FILE*)’:
>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:118: error: ‘__getdelim’ was not
>>>>>>>>>>>> declared in
>>>>>>>>>>>> this scope
>>>>>>>>>>>> g++:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.o:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error in<ACLiC>: Compilation failed!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error in<TSelector::GetSelector>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD.C++ does not have a valid class deriving from
>>>>>>>>>>>> TSelector
>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error
>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TProofPlayerSlave::Process>: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>> load: proxyWD3PD.C++
>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Warning
>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TXProofServ::HandleProcess>: the
>>>>>>>>>>>> output list is empty!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Received SIGTERM: terminating
>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:08:38 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Info in<TXProofServ::Terminate>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> starting
>>>>>>>>>>>> session termination operations ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:08:38 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Info in<TXProofServ::Terminate>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>> memory footprint: 65668 kB virtual, 26912 kB resident
>>>>>>>>>>>> Terminate: termination operations ended: quitting!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/04/2010 04:16 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am a bit confused. You are using:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain.Process("D3PDBase.C++","",100,0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the log you list mentioned proxyWD3PD.h and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD.C ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you call chain.MakeProxy ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/10 8:49 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the problem is, it does not even compile..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I use python for building the tChain, and the I do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain.Process("D3PDBase.C++","",100,0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROOF launches, but never manages to compile, see errors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also tried it from CINT, but it did not work either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:56 11493 Mst-0 | Info
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TXProofServ::SetQueryRunning>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting query: 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:56 11493 Mst-0 | Info in<TXProofServ::HandleInput>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kXPD_clusterinfo: tot: 1, act: 1, eff: 1.000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:57 11493 Mst-0 | Info in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <TPacketizerAdaptive::TPacketizerAdaptive>: fraction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:57 11493 Mst-0 | SvcMsg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TProofPlayerRemote::Process>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Start merging Memory information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:57 11493 Mst-0 | Info in<TXProofServ::HandleInput>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kXPD_clusterinfo: tot: 1, act: 1, eff: 1.000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:57 11493 Mst-0 | Info in<TXProofServ::HandleInput>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kXPD_clusterinfo: tot: 1, act: 1, eff: 1.000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11493 Mst-0 | SvcMsg in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <TProofPlayerRemote::AddOutputObject>: Memory 79320
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual 23328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resident after merging object MissingFiles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11493 Mst-0 | Info in<TXProofServ::HandleInput>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kXPD_clusterinfo: tot: 1, act: 1, eff: 1.000000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:45:57 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Info in<TUnixSystem::ACLiC>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared library
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C.so
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Warning: link requested for unknown srcfile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD.h
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_linkdef.h:8:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: Link requested for already precompiled class
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vector<float,allocator<float> > (ignore this message) :0:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:909,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.h:11,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.cxx:16:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h: In function ‘__ssize_t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getline(char**,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> size_t*, FILE*)’:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:118: error: ‘__getdelim’ was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not declared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in this scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g++:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211937-11493/worker-0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265211938-11507/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.o:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error in<ACLiC>: Compilation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TSelector::GetSelector>: file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proxyWD3PD.C++ does not have a valid class deriving from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TSelector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TProofPlayerSlave::Process>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot load: proxyWD3PD.C++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 16:46:00 11507 Wrk-0.1 | Warning
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in<TXProofServ::HandleProcess>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the output list is empty!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100203 17:08:36 11493 Proofx-E: Conn::SendRecv: reading
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> msg from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connmgr (server [localhost.localdomain:1093])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100203 17:08:37 11493 Proofx-E: Conn::CheckResp: server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [localhost.localdomain:1093] did not return OK replying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to last
>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100203 17:08:37 11493 Proofx-E: Conn::CheckErrorStatus:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error 3006:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Invalid request: 3101' ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/04/2010 03:41 PM, Philippe Canal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the calling sequence you use with 'MakeProxy'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Proof
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that leads to a failure?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (a priori MakeProxy should work as well as MakeSelector
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Proof
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless you use it via TTree::Draw).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/10 8:15 AM, Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gerri,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already tried this dictionary-solution and replacing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TLorentzVector-Single-Components by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vector<TLorentzVector>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was not very successful, although the code compiled,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> got segfaults when I trying to access these objects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches were perfectly fine, even vector<vector<int>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > etc. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this was the point when I gave up on MakeSelector and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tried
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MakeProxy (successfully).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the moment, using PROOF is not my highest priority.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proxy, I get a lot of interesting features I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already use with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root. So, for me it is perfectly fine to wait for a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROOT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/04/2010 02:24 PM, ganis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Including the dictionary for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vector<TLorentzVector> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggested by Philippe should work also with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TSelector. what errors do you get?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to add support for proxies in PROOF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gerri,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the principle idea was to read some "not-totally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flat" ntuple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (means vector<float> and vector<TLorentzVector>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mainly) with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> automatically generated code and PROOF. - Example
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data file can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be found at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://james.physik.uni-freiburg.de/~stoerig/testdata.root
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use Tree CommonContainersTree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already "played" around quite a while using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MakeSelector, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I encountered the problem that I could not access the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TLorentzVectors.. as the structure is not recognized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and also manual changes were not successful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I read somewhere that MakeProxy offers better support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for such
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peculiar data types - and nearly out of the box,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MakeProxy works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine for me and I can do my analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course I am open for any suggestions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/03/2010 07:12 PM, ganis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Kathrin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There no support for proxy in PROOF yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give more details about what you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to do so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we can try to suggest a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible solution?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerri Ganis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin Stoerig wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try to implement my analysis with MakeProxy and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proof.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The automatically generated code works fine with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROOT (5-26a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32 bit from cernafs), but when I try to compile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within PROOF,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get the following error messages related to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stdio.h?!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any help is very welcome.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kathrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:909,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208987-10792/worker-0.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208988-10803/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.h:11,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208987-10792/worker-0.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208988-10803/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.cxx:16:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h: In function ‘__ssize_t
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getline(char**, size_t*, FILE*)’:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/include/bits/stdio.h:118: error: ‘__getdelim’
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> declared in this scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g++:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/stoerig/.proof/session-pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208987-10792/worker-0.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -pb-d-128-141-42-207-1265208988-10803/./proxyWD3PD_C_ACLiC_dict.o:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No such file or directory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 15:56:48 10803 Wrk-0.0 | Error in<ACLiC>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Compilation failed!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 17:37:57 CET