Hi Marc,
see the doc of TTree::Draw, in particular this section:
// // Accessing collection objects // ============================ // // TTree::Draw default's handling of collections is to assume that any // request on a collection pertain to it content. For example, iffTracks
// is a collection of Track objects, the following: // tree->Draw("event.fTracks.fPx"); // will plot the value of fPx for each Track objects inside thecollection.
// Also // tree->Draw("event.fTracks.size()"); // would plot the result of the member function Track::size() for each // Track object inside the collection. // To access information about the collection itself, TTree::Drawsupport
// the '@' notation. If a variable which points to a collection is prefixed
// or postfixed with '@', the next part of the expression will pertain to
// the collection object. For example: // tree->Draw("event._at_fTracks.size()"); // will plot the size of the collection refered to by fTracks (i.ethe number
// of Track objects).
Rene
Marc Escalier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> would somebody know how to the following functionnality :
> let's assume a TTree has a variable myvar with myvar[0], myvar[1],
> ..., myvar[N]
> with N varying from event to events
>
> Is there a way to draw the histogram of the size of the myvar
> *without* doing the stuff of SetBranchAddress, etc... to get the
> variable then doing myvar->size()
> and so on
>
> ==>I mean, is that possible to do that in a very short way like :
> mytree->Draw("myvariable.TheMethodToGetTheSize()")
> or
> mytree->Project("myhisto","myvariable.TheMethodToGetTheSize()")
>
> thank you
>
Received on Fri Feb 26 2010 - 12:10:47 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 26 2010 - 17:50:01 CET