Hi Alexander,
what's in TMath is independent of what CINT does. So yes, I agree, this overload should be added to TMath and I believe Lorenzo is planning on doing that. I let him speak for himself, though :-) (He's just back from a conference and still catching up with emails, so please give him a day or two.)
Cheers, Axel.
On 7/21/10 8:40 PM, Alexander Voigt wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>> So if inside a ROOT macro you say pow(2, 2) or pow(2,2.) you should get >> what you want (this doesn't even require you to include cmath since CINT >> appears to already know about it). >> >> Not that using a ROOT macro probably won't give you the performance >> boost seen by in that test since you don't have the full set of >> optimizaitons available -- and if you would compile your code with ACLiC >> or directly you could just use std::pow from cmath yourself.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 22 2010 - 05:50:01 CEST