RE: TCanvas::BuildLegend & TF1

From: Olivier Couet <Olivier.Couet_at_cern.ch>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:56:56 +0200


Yes, you should do:
..Draw();
..Draw("same);
But still the texts in the legend are different. In one case the names appear and in the other the titles. Weird ....
I am investigating.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-roottalk_at_root.cern.ch [mailto:owner-roottalk_at_root.cern.ch] On Behalf Of Vassili Maroussov
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:22 PM
To: roottalk_at_root.cern.ch
Subject: Re: [ROOT] TCanvas::BuildLegend & TF1

Sorry,

I've used TGraph drawing options with TF1 (standard confusion...), but still: why the result is different for the interpreter and ACLiC?

Regards,

Vassili

On 08/03/2010 05:58 PM, Vassili Maroussov wrote:
> Dear ROOTers,
>
> after running the CheckBuildLegend.C script attached I expect to see
> plots of sine (kBlue) and cosine (kRed) in the same TCanvas with
> legend which contain "Sine" and "Cosine". However, neither in the
> interpreter (.x CheckBuildLegend.C) nor in the ACLiC (.x
> CheckBuildLegend.C+) mode a see both plots, but only the last
> "TF1::Draw". Moreover, resulting plot looks differently in the
> interpreter and ACLiC modes. What's wrong?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vassili
>
> P.S. Linux 2.6.32.16-141.fc12.x86_64, gcc version 4.4.4 20100630 (Red
> Hat 4.4.4-10), ROOT 5.27/05 (trunk_at_34633, Jul 28 2010, 13:31:45 on
> linuxx8664gcc)
>
Received on Wed Aug 04 2010 - 09:57:01 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 04 2010 - 11:50:01 CEST