I've had trouble with mean of subtracted histogram calulated by root ..
it's just plain wrong. Error very noticable when histogram is not
near sysmetric, but people might be fooled when it is reasonably
sysmetric. I just wrote my own mean calculatator based on bin content.
Default should be fixed to do something reasonable.
-Art S.
A.E. Snyder, Group ? \!c*p?/ SLAC Mail Stop #95 ((. .)) Box 4349 | Stanford, Ca, USA, 94309 '\|/` e-mail:snyder_at_slac.stanford.edu o phone:650-926-2701 _ http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~snyder BaBar FAX:707-313-0250 Collaboration & Fermi/GLAST
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Stefan Piperov wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Jan Friedrich wrote:
>
>>> me - but it would be interesting to hear to opinions of both user
>>> community, and professional statistiticians on this subject.
>>
>> What is the latter supposed to be?
>
> I believe there's a problem with the current way ROOT calculates means
> of histogrammed data, and a professional in the field can probably
> confirm/reject that.
> S.
>
> *---------------------------------------------------------------------*
> Stefan Piperov Mail: FNAL P.O.Box 500, MS 205, Batavia, IL-60510
> Phone: (630) 840-5176 E-Mail: piperov_at_fnal.gov
> *---------------------------------------------------------------------*
> "Give a skeptic an inch... and he'll measure it."
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 01 2011 - 20:23:03 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 23:50:01 CET