Re: setrange of x-axis

Hi again,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Nicholas Devenish <misnomer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The function "Set" that it links is itself unclear, and says that it
> *initialises* the axis (so no suggestion of the effect of an existing
> axis).

Just one small correction; I have now noticed that this is not a deliberate link; every instance of the (case-sensitive) word "Set" in that page of the documentation appears to have been turned into a hyperlink to the Set function by the documentation engine, so is coincidence that the reference is approximately correct.

This is probably a separate, and misleading bug (IIRC the ROOT documentation uses it's own parser, I have seen the question asked why Doxygen was not used many times but never seen the answer, is there any historical documentation on this decision, as it would be interesting to see the reasoning). Received on Thu Jul 21 2011 - 15:08:43 CEST