Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco_at_cern.ch> wrote:
>> You can always have named macros.
Sorry I wasn't clear enough. Although ROOT does not allow you to define functions within rootcint, you can always define such functions in a root macro.
> root script.C 'complicated_form_to_pass_arguments'
> i have :
> script arg1 arg2
> and i kind of want to keep this ..
To retain your workflow all you need is to change the shebang line from root to bash/<whatever shell you use>.
An example:
#!/bin/bash
root -l -b <<EOF
.L someROOTmacro.C+
someROOTmacro(..)
.q
EOF
The added advantage of this method is you can do all kinds of string
manipulation with the arguments you pass to the script with usual shell
scripting tricks. For the lack of a better name, your script becomes a
"bi-lingual" script (bash and ROOT).
> Thank you,
> Adrian
Hope this helps.
-- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.Received on Fri Jul 29 2011 - 11:40:23 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 29 2011 - 23:50:01 CEST