On 08/21/11 16:58, Axel Naumann wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi!
> Thanks for your suggestion. We can't determine the sizeof(index), all we
> have is a pointer (not an array), and that would just return you
> sizeof(void*).
hmm .. that would mean that the arrays that are the arguments are
deprecated somewhere somehow to (void*)
> A recommendation: you could have used valgrind to find this problem in
> your usage of Sort().
well, this is how i found out my problem in my code (i did some copy
paste of an sort and i forgot to adjust the number of elements..)
Thanks,
Adrian
>
> Cheers, Axel.
>
>
> On 8/21/11 1:29 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> Hi! I was wondering if would be useful (for me it would because i just >> had some headaches because of this) to have a warning in case that >> either (this arguments related to [1]): >> 1. n < sizeof(index)/sizeof(index[0]) >> or >> 2. sizeof(index) < sizeof(a) >> >> and definitely an error (if it is needed..) for >> n > sizeof(a) >> >> Thanks, >> Adrian >> >> [1]. http://root.cern.ch/root/html/src/TMath.h.html#YYNCbB
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 21 2011 - 23:50:01 CEST