Hi,
sorry. Maybe I have some 'rain in my brain' currenty :-) ....
nevertheless,
shouldn't the calculated error (estimated from the gaussian error propagation) at each fit point of a fit-function overlap with the fit-values to 68% == 1sigma.
I do not see this behaviour. That's way I'm asking if the errors need to be scaled somehow to obtain correct values
Thanks Georg
Am 15.11.2011 um 10:24 schrieb Olivier Couet:
>> I still have problems how to correctly calculate an error band
> > > The errors band are simply drawn using the errors. It is simply an other way to draw the errors. > I guess you should know what the errors of your graphs should be … ? > > > On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Georg Troska wrote: >
>>> See: >>> >>> http://root.cern.ch/root/html/TGraphPainter.html#GP03 >>> >>> >>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Mohammed Zakaria wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Try something like: >>>> Try using class TGraphErrors (name it for example f1), there you will >>>> find the option: >>>> f1 -> Draw("E3 same"); >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Mohammed Zakaria >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Georg Troska >>>> <georg.troska_at_uni-dortmund.de> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to plot the significance-area of a fit function. But I do not want to use error bars, but something like a colored region - A polygon through the ends of invisible error-bars would be fine. >>>>> I think it is possible to make an exclusion plot (see example in manual) but in this case the exclusion width needs to be constant. >>>>> >>>>> simple example could be: >>>>> >>>>> function y=x [0,10] >>>>> and the error is e(y) = 0.1*x >>>>> >>>>> Hope its clear, what I want to say? Hard to explain... hope someone has a hint >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Georg >>>>> >>>> >>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 20 2011 - 11:50:01 CET