[OLSZEWSKI: TCanvas behaviour]

From: ISTD/STD (hollyo@arl.mil)
Date: Thu Jan 16 1997 - 17:25:46 MET


To Whom it may concern,

Could someone please take me off this mailing
list!? I don't know how I got on it in the
first place. I'd greatly appreciate some help.

	Thank you in advance,
	Holly Ingham
	email: hollyo@arl.mil
	phone:(410)278-9192
	Army Research Laboratory
	Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005

----- Forwarded message # 1:

Received: from wharf.arl.mil by SMOKEY.ARL.MIL id aa09780; 16 Jan 97 9:54 EST
Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by wharf.arl.mil id aa20516; 16 Jan 97 9:54 EST
Received: from hpsalo.cern.ch (hpsalo.cern.ch [128.141.201.204]) by dxmint.cern.ch 
	with ESMTP id PAA15220; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hpsalo.cern.ch (8.7.1/8.7.1) id JAA18622 for roottalk-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 09:53:44 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: hpsalo.cern.ch: majordom set sender to owner-roottalk@root.cern.ch using -f
Received: from dxmint.cern.ch (dxmint.cern.ch [137.138.26.76]) by hpsalo.cern.ch with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id PAA18618 for <roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:43 +0100 (MET)
From: OLSZEWSKI@vsk02.ifj.edu.pl
Received: from nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl (nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl [149.156.1.3]) by dxmint.cern.ch 
	with ESMTP id PAA14812 for <roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: from CHOPIN.IFJ.EDU.PL (chopin.ifj.edu.pl [192.86.14.9])
          by nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id PAA28097 for <@NMS.CYF-KR.EDU.PL:roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: from decnet-mail by chopin.ifj.edu.pl with PMDF#10000; Thu, 16 Jan
 1997 15:45 GMT+1
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:45 GMT+1
Subject: TCanvas behaviour
To: roottalk <roottalk%hpsalo.cern.ch@nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
Message-id: <4CB33A156020D662@chopin.ifj.edu.pl>
X-Envelope-to: @NMS.CYF-KR.EDU.PL:roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch
X-VMS-To: CHOPIN::IN%"roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch"
X-VMS-Cc: OLSZEWSKI
Sender: owner-roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch
Precedence: bulk


 Observation on SGI, Irix 5.3:

 One should only create TCanvas variables with "new" and not declare them
 like: TCanvas can("ala");. In this later case the ROOT can not be reset
 neither by .reset nor by gROOT.Reset() and executing same macro again
 induces "segmentation violation" error.

 Trying other classes I do not observe this kind of behaviour. Is this
 an error in ROOT?

 Andrzej.O.

----- End of forwarded messages



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:26:17 MET