To Whom it may concern, Could someone please take me off this mailing list!? I don't know how I got on it in the first place. I'd greatly appreciate some help. Thank you in advance, Holly Ingham email: hollyo@arl.mil phone:(410)278-9192 Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005 ----- Forwarded message # 1: Received: from wharf.arl.mil by SMOKEY.ARL.MIL id aa09780; 16 Jan 97 9:54 EST Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by wharf.arl.mil id aa20516; 16 Jan 97 9:54 EST Received: from hpsalo.cern.ch (hpsalo.cern.ch [128.141.201.204]) by dxmint.cern.ch with ESMTP id PAA15220; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:52 +0100 (MET) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hpsalo.cern.ch (8.7.1/8.7.1) id JAA18622 for roottalk-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 09:53:44 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hpsalo.cern.ch: majordom set sender to owner-roottalk@root.cern.ch using -f Received: from dxmint.cern.ch (dxmint.cern.ch [137.138.26.76]) by hpsalo.cern.ch with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id PAA18618 for <roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:43 +0100 (MET) From: OLSZEWSKI@vsk02.ifj.edu.pl Received: from nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl (nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl [149.156.1.3]) by dxmint.cern.ch with ESMTP id PAA14812 for <roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from CHOPIN.IFJ.EDU.PL (chopin.ifj.edu.pl [192.86.14.9]) by nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA28097 for <@NMS.CYF-KR.EDU.PL:roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:53:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from decnet-mail by chopin.ifj.edu.pl with PMDF#10000; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:45 GMT+1 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:45 GMT+1 Subject: TCanvas behaviour To: roottalk <roottalk%hpsalo.cern.ch@nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl> Message-id: <4CB33A156020D662@chopin.ifj.edu.pl> X-Envelope-to: @NMS.CYF-KR.EDU.PL:roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch X-VMS-To: CHOPIN::IN%"roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch" X-VMS-Cc: OLSZEWSKI Sender: owner-roottalk@hpsalo.cern.ch Precedence: bulk Observation on SGI, Irix 5.3: One should only create TCanvas variables with "new" and not declare them like: TCanvas can("ala");. In this later case the ROOT can not be reset neither by .reset nor by gROOT.Reset() and executing same macro again induces "segmentation violation" error. Trying other classes I do not observe this kind of behaviour. Is this an error in ROOT? Andrzej.O. ----- End of forwarded messages
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:26:17 MET