Pasha Murat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about rootcint parsing a type definition
> (I'm using SGI IRIX 5.3, GCC-compiled ROOT 1.01/03):
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -1-
>
> I have a problem when trying to define a new type interactively:
>
> CINT/ROOT C/C++ Interpreter version 5.13.10, May 22 1997
> Type ? for help. Commands must be C++ statements.
> Enclose multiple statements between { }.
> root [0] struct AA {
> end with '}'> int ia;
> end with '}'> };
> root [1] AA a;
> root [2] a.ia = 10;
>
> *** Break *** segmentation violation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -2-
>
> However the same type definition could be used without any problem
> when loaded from a file:
>
> -------------------------- test.cc
> struct AA {
> int ia;
> };
> ---------------------------
>
> root [0] .L test.cc
> root [1] AA a;
> root [2] a.ia = 10;
> root [3] .p a
> (struct AA)272045208
> 0x0 int ia=10
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -3-
> Finally, the following command sequence works:
>
> root [13] typedef struct AA {
> end with '}'> int ia;
> end with '}'> };
> root [14] a.ia = 10;
> root [15] .p a
> (struct AA)272045208
> 0x0 int ia=10
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The question is why interactive type definition does require
> `typedef' whereas loading the same type definition from the macro
> file does not?
>
When you have multilines input, you should always start by a { and close with a }
The following will work:
{
struct AA {
int ia;
};
}
Rene Brun
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:26:19 MET