Re: Tk vs Motif

From: Grave Xavier (xavier@lapp.in2p3.fr)
Date: Tue Sep 02 1997 - 10:49:19 MEST


Pasha Murat wrote:
> 
>         Hi,
> 
> this question is more conceptual than practical. There are certain advantages
> in using Tk as a window manager instead of Motif:
> 
> - it is free (well, LessTif is also free);
> - it is simple;
> - there is a Windows port of Tk, so the application itself may not know
>   about the difference between graphics interfaces between UNIX and Windows -
>   this is what is called portability issue;
> - on UNIX it requires only libX11, but not libXt etc, so one doesn't link in
>   alot of stuff he doesn't really need
> - there is an interface (Togl by Paul/Henderson) which allows to do GL rendering
>   whithin Tk canvas
> 
> Of course, in this case one should care about having Tk distributed along with
> his product - this doesn't sound very attractive...
> 
> So the question is : if ROOT team ever considered using Tk as a window manager?
> 
>                                         Thanks, Pasha

Hello,

An other interface builder is xform.
It is also free and using x11.
It write some c code and have a Window designer.
The window designer able to create application very quickly.

http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms

Bye.

Xavier Grave
-- 
xavier@virgoa4.in2p3.fr
De chacun selon ses forces, a chacun selon ses besoins.
Au fait, tous mes propos n'engagent que moi et aucunement
l'in2p3 ni le CNRS d'ailleurs.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:26:20 MET