CINT instead of Perl

From: Damir Buskulic (buskulic@lapp.in2p3.fr)
Date: Wed Nov 25 1998 - 09:57:42 MET

Next message: Masaharu Goto: "RE:RootCint constrain: Too many open fil"
Previous message: Rudi Lutter: "GUI question"
Next in thread: Masaharu Goto: "RE:CINT instead of Perl"
Maybe reply: Masaharu Goto: "RE:CINT instead of Perl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

One of my friends asked me if he could use cint as a replacement for
Perl. What are the advantages-disadvantages of such a request ?
I can personnaly think about two or three things :
- Perl is probably more suited to automate things
- Is it more or less stable than CINT ? Probably a little bit more
mature
- But you cannot compile things in Perl

Any thoughts ?

Damir
-- 
=====================================================================
| Damir Buskulic                  | Universite de Savoie/LAPP       |
|                                 | Chemin de Bellevue, B.P. 110    |
| Tel : +33 (0)450091600          | F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex   |
| e-mail: buskulic@lapp.in2p3.fr  | FRANCE                          |
=====================================================================
mailto:buskulic@lapp.in2p3.fr

Next message: Masaharu Goto: "RE:RootCint constrain: Too many open fil"
Previous message: Rudi Lutter: "GUI question"
Next in thread: Masaharu Goto: "RE:CINT instead of Perl"
Maybe reply: Masaharu Goto: "RE:CINT instead of Perl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:34:40 MET