Re: problem with CINT `**' extension

From: Pasha Murat (murat@cdfsga.fnal.gov)
Date: Mon Dec 07 1998 - 23:50:36 MET 

Dear Urs, you're definitely right, but this doesn't make the life safer 
-  a simple misprint could lead to the results being completely 
screwed up. I think there should be kind of check of argument validity range,
otherwise one gets:

root [28] 9999999999+9999999999
(int)(-2)

						-regards, pasha.

Urs Langenegger writes:
 > 
 > I think that has less to do with '**' but with (int). If I cast onto
 > (double), everything works fine for me.
 > 
 > Cheers,
 > --U.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:34:40 MET