Re: MakeClass ( 2 )

From: Christoph Borgmeier (borg@mail.desy.de)
Date: Thu Apr 15 1999 - 20:01:05 MEST

Next message: Stephen Markacs: "Re: reading a binary file"
Previous message: Marcelo Munhoz: "reading a binary file"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 15 Apr 1999, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote:

[...]
> ---559023410-851401618-924162663=:11908
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="MakeClass.cxx"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
> Content-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990415095103.11908E@uranos.cto.us.edu.pl>
> Content-Description: MakeClass.cxx
> 
> Ly9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f
> X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KDQpJbnRfdCBN
> YWtlQ2xhc3MoVFRyZWUgKnQsIGNvbnN0IGNoYXIgKmNsYXNzbmFtZSA9IDAp
> DQp7DQovLz09PT0+DQovLyotKi0qLSotKi0qLSpHZW5lcmF0ZSBza2VsZXRv
[...]

Hello everyone,

Am I the only one (except Masaharu), who finds more and more unreadable
message parts? If the roottalk policy on tolerated message formats is
different from the quasi-usenet-standard, I might have to adjust my
system. What do you think about it?

Best regards
Chris "but please no Word-and-Excel documents" toph

Next message: Stephen Markacs: "Re: reading a binary file"
Previous message: Marcelo Munhoz: "reading a binary file"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:31 MET