Hello, Petar, > > Dear Rooters, > > this might be a newbie question, but it should be nevertheless interesting > as an illustration how non-intuitive (and thus non-trivial) some of > ROOT's features are. > I think what you are speaking about is not ROOT but generic C++ "problem". Nobody claimed C++ is a kind of trivial language. Very likely you wanted to say: ntuple->SetBranchAddress("x",&x1); ^ | ------------------+ instead of yours ntuple->SetBranchAddress("x",x1); At least when I changed your text and it works as expected. The result you got os expected as well, since you told Ntuple the address to keep the x values is "0" (very likey ZERO it could any value, since you didn't initiated Float_t x at all. Hope this helps, Valery > I'm trying to simultaneously fill an ntuple and read from it (in > another section of the code). One can argue that is perfectly > reasonable to collect a bunch of events, pause the run, analyze them, > and then keep on filling the ntuple. > > However, it seams that SetBranchAddress() interferes with the Fill() > method for the variables for which SetBranchAddress() was issued. > These variables end up being 0. > > The example below (which is a slightly modified root tutorial) > illustrates the point: > > { > FILE *fp = fopen("foo.txt","r"); > > Float_t x,y,z; > Float_t x1; > > Int_t ncols; > Int_t nlines = 0; > > TNtuple *ntuple = new TNtuple("ntuple","data from ascii file","x:y:z"); > > // ****************************************************************** > ntuple->SetBranchAddress("x",x1); // <----- why is this dangerous??? > // ****************************************************************** > > while (1) { > ncols = fscanf(fp,"%f %f %f",&x, &y, &z); > if (ncols < 0) break; > if (nlines < 5) printf("x=%8f, y=%8f, z=%8f\n",x,y,z); > ntuple->Fill(x,y,z); > nlines++; > } > fclose(fp); > } > > Where the ntuple is read from the file > % cat foo.txt > 1 2 3 > 1.1 2.2 3.3 > -1.1 -2.2 -3.3 > -1 -2 -3 > 1.5 1.5 1.5 > > > Here, if the SetBranchAddress() is commented out, everything is fine. > But once it's uncommented, all "x" entries are 0.0. > > My questions: > > 1. It's obvious that I'm doing something silly, but for a non-expert > like me it's hard to pin down the location of this silliness. > > 2. If this behavior of TTree is a feature (which it may well be), then what > is the correct way of doing this? > > Many thanks! > > Petar >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:32 MET