Re: CINT .L problem

From: Jacek M. Holeczek (holeczek@us.edu.pl)
Date: Mon May 17 1999 - 10:23:05 MEST


> ( ... )
>  { TH1F *h_tpat= new TH1F(); }
> 
> The page:
> 
> http://root.cern.ch/root/CintInterpreter.html
> 
>  says:
> 
> " .... CINT as Macro Processor ...
> . . .
> 
>   Lets start with a macro containing a simple list of statements
>   (like the multi command line example given in the previous section).
>   T h i s    t y p e   o f   m a c r o   m u s t    s t a r t    w i t h
>    a   "{"    a n d    e n d    w i t h    a     "}".
>   . . . "
> 
> 
>  Please correct me,
O.K., you asked for it.
38 lines below you can read:
   N o t i c e   t h a t   n o   s u r r o u n d i n g  "{"  a n d  "}"
   a r e   r e q u i r e d   i n   t h i s   c a s e.
Anyhow, the problem is NOT whether there should be parentheses or not,
but that Masa claims HIS root/cint initializes the pointer upon ".L",
while MINE does NOT.
Jacek.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 00:43:33 MET